Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40275 (AP)

PERUGU VASU v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/29784/2025 · 2025-10-29

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010569892025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 29784/2025 Between: Perugu Vasu ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G.SAI LOCHAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP 2. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING The Court made the following: -2- W.P. No.29784 OF 2025 Date of order: 30.10.2025 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.29784 OF 2025 ORDER 1. This writ petition is filed aggrieved by the action of the respondents for non-payment of the bills for the works undertaken by the petitioner. 2. Heard the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Pleader for Municipal Administration and Urban Development, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Finance and Planning, and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent-Corporation. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the 4th respondent has awarded the work i.e., construction of providing CC road and CC drain from Nagendra Swamy Putta to existing CC road in Gopal Nagar in 1st line in Division No.6, to the petitioner under an agreement No.567/2022-23, dt.02.12.2022. 4. The learned counsel further submits that the petitioner duly executed the works to the satisfaction of the 4th respondent. It is further submitted that after execution of the works, the authorities of the 4th respondent recorded the progress of the work in M Books and thereafter, the petitioner has submitted a final bill for a sum of Rs.2,99,523/- to the 4th respondent and the same was -3- W.P. No.29784 OF 2025 Date of order: 30.10.2025 forwarded to the 3rd respondent, but so far no payment has been made to the petitioner. 5. In reply, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the 3rd respondent submits that there is no dispute with respect to the completion of the works undertaken by the petitioner and the payment would be made shortly. 6. Considering the submissions, respondents 2, 3 and 7 are hereby directed to verify and release the payments due payable to the petitioner as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four (04) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 7. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. 8. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N BV