IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 262 AMAN AND OTHERS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM: Present: MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (ORAL) 1. 2023 is for quashing of FIR No.7 dated 05.02.2025 under Sections 115(2), 118, 333, 191(3),190, 351(3) of the BNS, 2023, registered at Police Station Division No.5, District Police Commissionerate Jalandhar, along with all consequential proceedings arising ther (Annexure P- 2. directed to appear before the learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate on 28.04.2025 to get their statements recorded regarding the compromise arrived at, between them. 3. Ist Class, Jalandhar IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM- Date of decision: May 27 AMAN AND OTHERS Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL Mr. Arpan Sabharwal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Sahil Chaudhary, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Raman Kumar, Advocate for Mr. Rahul Garg, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 5. MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (ORAL) Prayer in the instant petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, is for quashing of FIR No.7 dated 05.02.2025 under Sections 115(2), 118, 333, 191(3),190, 351(3) of the BNS, 2023, registered at Police Station Division No.5, District Police Commissionerate Jalandhar, along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise -2). Vide order dated 02.04.2025 of this Court, the parties were directed to appear before the learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate on .2025 to get their statements recorded regarding the compromise ived at, between them. Report has since been received from learned Judicial Magistrate Jalandhar, in pursuance of the directions of this Court, wherein IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -M-17825-2025 Date of decision: May 27, 2025 ...Petitioners ...Respondents HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL , Advocate , Punjab. for filed under Section 528 of BNSS, is for quashing of FIR No.7 dated 05.02.2025 under Sections 115(2), 118, 333, 191(3),190, 351(3) of the BNS, 2023, registered at Police Station Division No.5, District Police Commissionerate Jalandhar, along with all efrom on the basis of compromise .2025 of this Court, the parties were directed to appear before the learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate on .2025 to get their statements recorded regarding the compromise Report has since been received from learned Judicial Magistrate , in pursuance of the directions of this Court, wherein the ...Petitioners ...Respondents filed under Section 528 of BNSS, is for quashing of FIR No.7 dated 05.02.2025 under Sections 115(2), 118, 333, 191(3),190, 351(3) of the BNS, 2023, registered at Police Station Division No.5, District Police Commissionerate Jalandhar, along with all efrom on the basis of compromise .2025 of this Court, the parties were directed to appear before the learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate on .2025 to get their statements recorded regarding the compromise Report has since been received from learned Judicial Magistrate the Jaspreet Kaur 2025.05.27 17:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CRM-M-17825 factum of the compromise arrived at between the confirmed. As per the report, compromise has indeed been effected between the parties and the same is without any pressure or coercion and out of their free will, and the complainants have also made statement to the effect that they would have no objection if the FIR qua the accused quashed. 4. original, along with its report. 5. accused other aggrieved persons in the FIR in question. 6. principles laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in Punjab and other Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and another, 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 FIR and all consequential proceedings arising ou 7. compromise and their statements recorded before the Court below. May 27, 2025 Jaspreet Kaur 17825-2025 factum of the compromise arrived at between the confirmed. As per the report, compromise has indeed been effected between the parties and the same is without any pressure or coercion and out of their free will, and the complainants have also made statement to the effect that they would have no objection if the FIR qua the accused The trial Court has annexed the statements of the parties , along with its report. Learned State counsel too submits that there are no other accused other than the petitioners and respondents No.2 aggrieved persons in the FIR in question. In view of the report of the learned trial Court, and the principles laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, and also by the Full Bench of this Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and another, 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, the instant petition is allowed. The aforesaid FIR and all consequential proceedings arising ou Needless to say the parties shall remain bound by the terms of compromise and their statements recorded before the Court below. May 27, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable -2- factum of the compromise arrived at between the parties stands verified and confirmed. As per the report, compromise has indeed been effected between the parties and the same is without any pressure or coercion and out of their free will, and the complainants have also made statement to the effect that they would have no objection if the FIR qua the accused-petitioners is The trial Court has annexed the statements of the parties in Learned State counsel too submits that there are no other than the petitioners and respondents No.2 to 5 are the only In view of the report of the learned trial Court, and the principles laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in Gian Singh Vs. State of , and also by the Full Bench of this Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and another, , the instant petition is allowed. The aforesaid FIR and all consequential proceedings arising out of it, are quashed. Needless to say the parties shall remain bound by the terms of compromise and their statements recorded before the Court below. (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No parties stands verified and confirmed. As per the report, compromise has indeed been effected between the parties and the same is without any pressure or coercion and out of their free will, and the complainants have also made statement to the effect that petitioners is in Learned State counsel too submits that there are no other are the only In view of the report of the learned trial Court, and the Gian Singh Vs. State of , and also by the Full Bench of this Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and another, , the instant petition is allowed. The aforesaid Needless to say the parties shall remain bound by the terms of Jaspreet Kaur 2025.05.27 17:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh