Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40272 (RAJ)

GANDHI VIDHYA MANDIR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/2525/2021 · 2025-10-13

Anand Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:41611] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2493/2021 Gandhi Vidhya Mandir, Sardar Shahar, District- Churu, Office At Sardar Shahar, District- Churu (Rajasthan) Through It’s Secretary (Earlier Designation Add. Registrar Ramprasad Pareekh Son Of Shri Shivdanram Pareekh. ----Petitioner/Complainant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2525/2021 Gandhi Vidhya Mandir, Sardar Shahar, District-Churu, Office At Sardar Shahar, District- Churu (Rajasthan), Through Its Secretary (Earlier Designation- Addl. Registrar Ramprasad Pareekh Son Of Shri Shivdanram Pareekh. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sandeep Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 13/10/2025 1. S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No. 2493/2021 has been filed by the petitioner with the contention that FIR No. 381/2016 registered at Police Station Dudu, Dist. Jaipur, is not being properly investigated and a direction is sought to further entrust investigation to CBI/SOG or any other Investigating Authority. Similar prayer has been made by the petitioner in S.B. Criminal [2025:RJ-JP:41611] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-2493/2021] Misc. Petition No. 2525/2021, in respect of FIR No. 380/2016 (wrongly mentioned as FIR No. 381/2016 in the prayer of the petition) registered at the same Police Station. 2. It is submitted that the Investigating Officer did not investigate properly in respect of the above FIRs and filed a negative final report treating the dispute to be of civil nature. It was submitted that as the investigation was faulty, the petitioner was constrained to approach this Court. However, thereafter, the petitioner filed a protest petition opposing the negative final report proposed by Investigating Authority and on such protest petition, directions for further investigation was given. Again it yielded the same result and negative final report was proposed by the Investigating Authority. On opposing the same now vide order dated 05.07.2025, the learned Court below has not accepted the negative final report submitted by the Investigating Authority and the same has been returned with the direction to conclude the investigation after conducting further investigation and to produce the result by 10.10.2025. It is submitted that even on 10.10.2025, no progress has been made by the police authorities. 4. Copy of order dated 05.07.2025 passed by Senior Civil Judge & Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dudu, District Jaipurhas been produced which is taken on record. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor submits that the Investigating Officer has been conducting the investigation strictly in accordance with law and without there being any bias or ill-will. 6. I have considered the submissions and perused the record. [2025:RJ-JP:41611] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-2493/2021] 7. In the light of order dated 05.07.2025 submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner in respect of FIR No. 381/2016 and the submission that similar order has also been passed in respect of FIR No. 380/2016, whereby the trial Court has not accepted the negative final report submitted by the Investigating Authority and directions have been given to conduct further investigation, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of these criminal misc. petitions to carry out fair and further investigation in compliance of order dated 05.07.2025 passed by learned trial Court. Since the FIRs relate to 2016,therefore, the final result of investigation be produced before the learned Court below within a period of 6 weeks from the date of submitting a certified copy of this order. 8. Both the petitions are disposed of with the above directions. 9. A copy of this order be placed on record of connected petition. (ANAND SHARMA),J NEERU/8-9