VIRESH KUMAR VARSHNEY AND 20 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS
WRIC/10977/2025 · 2025-04-14
Manish Kumar Nigam
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40270 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40270 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:54425 Court No. - 35 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10977 of 2025 Petitioner :- Viresh Kumar Varshney And 20 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dhiraj Kumar,Shashi Ranjan Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Vibhanshu Vaibhav Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel and Shri Vibhanshu Vaibhav, learned counsel for respondent no. 6 and perused the record.
2. The present petition has been filed with the following prayer:
"Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari calling the records of the case and quash the impugned order dated 05.02.2025 in Case No. 971/2021. Computerized Case No. C202118000000971 (Viresh Kumar Varshney and others vs. State of U. P. and others) under section 38 (4) U. P. Revenue Code-2006 passed by the Commissioner Aligarh Division Aligarh (ANNEXURE NO. 45 to this writ petition)."
3. Learned Standing Counsel has raised a preliminary objection that against order impugned, the petitioner has an alternative remedy of filing revision under Section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.
4. Since the petitioner has an alternative remedy, I am not inclined to entertain the instant petition.
5. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedy as available to him under law. Order Date :- 15.4.2025 Ved Prakash (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad