Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4027 (CHH)

JAGMOHAN v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

MCRC/842/2025 · 2025-02-12

Shri Arvind Kumar Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:7583 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 842 of 2025 1 - Jagmohan S/o Jitansai Nagwanshi Aged About 45 Years R/o Village Sukwas, Gahanahariya, Police Station Lailunga, District- Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. ... Applicant (s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Officer-In-Charge Police Station-Lailunga, District- Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Applicant (s) : Shri Danish Ahmad Siddiqui, Advocate appearing on behalf of Shri Ishan Verma, Advocate. For the State : Shri Neeraj Sharma, Dy. Advocate General. Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma Order on Board 12/02/2025 1. The default pointed out by the Registry is ignored. 2. The applicant has preferred first bail application under Section 483 of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita for grant of regular bail as he has been arrested in connection with Crime No.326/2021 registered at Police Station Lailunga, District Raigarh (C.G.) for the offence NARESH KUMAR KAMDE Digitally signed by NARESH KUMAR KAMDE Date: 2025.02.14 14:21:25 +0530 2 punishable under Sections 302, 201 of IPC. 3. The brief facts of the case is that on 23.11.2021 deceased/son of the applicant namely Umesh Nagwanshi was drunk and was abusing the applicant and out of anger the applicant assaulted the deceased with a Muller. Thereafter the deceased died on the spot and the applicant took the dead body and threw it in to the well. Subsequently the dead body was found by some of the villagers and report was lodged. Thereafter investigation was initiated by the police station Lailunga and the applicant was arrested, hence, he may be released on bail. 4. Learned counsel for the State opposes the submission made by learned counsel for the applicant and submits that offence committed by applicant is of grievous nature. Hence, he is not entitled for grant of bail. 5. Heard learned counsel for both the parties. 6. Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, nature of allegations, there is no intention to kill his son and the fact that applicant is in jail since 26.11.2021, charge-sheet has been filed, trial will take more time to conclude the trial, without commenting anything on merits of the case, I am inclined to allow bail application of applicant. 7. Accordingly, bail application is allowed. It is directed that applicant - Jagmohan shall be released on regular bail, on his furnishing bail bond in sum of Rs.10,000/- with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the Court on the conditions that- a) He shall appear before the Trial Court regularly on each and every date, unless exempted from appearance. 3 b) He shall not, in any manner, tamper with the prosecution witnesses. c) If he is found involved in similar offence in the future, it will be open for the State to apply for cancellation of Bail. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/-Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) JUDGE Kamde