APHC010573192025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH FRIDAY,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA CIVIL REVISION PETITION N Between: 1. S DEVANANDAM, S/o. Late G.M. Shokkan, aged about 42 years, residing at Veeragurra Chittoor District. 2. S. Saravanabavanantham,, S/o. Late G.M. Shokkan, aged about 38 years, residing at Veeragurrammathopu, Mudara Mandal, Chittoor District. 3. S. Sivanandam, , S/o. Late G.M. Shokkan, aged about 35 years, residing at Veeragurrammathopu, Mudaramdoddi Post, V. Kota Mandal, Chittoor District. AND 1. K RAMAMURTHY NAIDU, S/o. Late 70 years, residing at Door No. 3 Kota Town, Post and Mandal, Chittoor District. 2. R Nagaraja Naidu, S/o. K. residing at Veeragurramma Thopu, Chittoor District. 3. K Mallika, W/o. K. Ramamurthy Naidu (second wife), aged about 55 years, residing at Door No. 3 Town, Post and Mandal, Chittoor District. Counsel for the Petitioners Counsel for the Respondents: The Court made the following Heard Mr.Karthik Shah, learned counsel for the petitioners. As the matter is being disposed of, without going into merits of the case to the respondents is deemed not necessary. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI FRIDAY,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2975 OF 2025 S DEVANANDAM, S/o. Late G.M. Shokkan, aged about 42 years, Veeragurrammathopu, Mudaramdoddi Post, V. 2. S. Saravanabavanantham,, S/o. Late G.M. Shokkan, aged about 38 years, residing at Veeragurrammathopu, Mudaramdoddi Post, V. Kota Mandal, Chittoor District. 3. S. Sivanandam, , S/o. Late G.M. Shokkan, aged about 35 years, residing at Veeragurrammathopu, Mudaramdoddi Post, V. Kota Mandal, 1. K RAMAMURTHY NAIDU, S/o. Late K. Krishanaiah Naidu, aged about 70 years, residing at Door No. 3-77, 0pp. Girls Hostel, Eswaranagar, Kota Town, Post and Mandal, Chittoor District. 2. R Nagaraja Naidu, S/o. K. Ramamurthy Naidu, aged about 50 residing at Veeragurramma Thopu, Mudaramdoddi Post, V. 3. K Mallika, W/o. K. Ramamurthy Naidu (second wife), aged about 55 years, residing at Door No. 3-77, 0pp. Girls Hostel, Eswaranagar, V. Kota Town, Post and Mandal, Chittoor District. ...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners : Mr.Jada Sravan Kumar Counsel for the Respondents: --- The Court made the following ORDER: Heard Mr.Karthik Shah, learned counsel for the petitioners. As the matter is being disposed of, without going into merits of the case to the respondents is deemed not necessary. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH FRIDAY,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA 2975 OF 2025 S DEVANANDAM, S/o. Late G.M. Shokkan, aged about 42 years, mmathopu, Mudaramdoddi Post, V.Kota Mandal, 2. S. Saravanabavanantham,, S/o. Late G.M. Shokkan, aged about 38 mdoddi Post, V. Kota 3. S. Sivanandam, , S/o. Late G.M. Shokkan, aged about 35 years, residing at Veeragurrammathopu, Mudaramdoddi Post, V. Kota Mandal, ...Petitioners . Krishanaiah Naidu, aged about 0pp. Girls Hostel, Eswaranagar, V. Ramamurthy Naidu, aged about 50 years, Kota Mandal, 3. K Mallika, W/o. K. Ramamurthy Naidu (second wife), aged about 55 ls Hostel, Eswaranagar, V. Kota ...Respondents Mr.Jada Sravan Kumar Heard Mr.Karthik Shah, learned counsel for the petitioners. As the matter is being disposed of, without going into merits of the case, notice 2 2. The grievance of the petitioners / plaintiffs in O.S. No.33 of 2025 on the file of the Court of Civil Judge (Junior Division), Palamaner, in short, is that I.A. No.50 of 2025 filed in the said suit, seeking temporary injunction under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 and Section 151 of Civil Procedure Code, is not being taken up for consideration. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners referring to docket proceedings filed on 13.11.2025, inter alia submits that despite service of notice on the defendants in the said suit, the matter is being adjourned for filing counter affidavits. He submits that though the said I.A., was filed along with the suit, for the specific reasons set out in the affidavit filed in support of the I.A., and the urgency is explained, the learned Civil Judge, instead of considering the matter, has been adjourning the same from time to time and as a result of which, the very object of filing the I.A., will be defeated. He submits that the matter is posted to 22.12.2025 and unless the said I.A., is directed to be disposed of expeditiously, the petitioner suffers serious prejudice and great hardship. 4. Considering the said submissions, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of, providing that the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) shall make endeavour to dispose of the I.A., referred to above, after giving opportunity to both sides, strictly in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ NINALA JAYASURYA,J November 14, 2025. vasu