HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9546 of 2024 Court No. - 89 HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J. 1. The case is taken up on mentioning. 2. Heard Sri Ashok Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri B. P. Singh, learned AGA for the State-opposite party no.1. 3. This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred with prayer to quash the entire proceeding of S.T. No.246 of 2016 (State Vs. Babu and others), arising out of Case Crime No.363 of 2015, under sections 147, 148, 149, 452, 323, 324, 307, 504, 506, IPC, Police Station Simbhawali, District Hapur, on the basis of compromise. 4. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicants that first informant namely Guljar and one of the injured namely Intzar(brother of Guljar) have died. It is further contended that the injuries of the injured Intzar is on his right arm, which is not a vital part and the injuries suffered by the other injured namely Smt. Nishat (wife of Guljar)/opposite party no.2, are simple in nature. 5. It is further contended by learned counsel for the applicants that applicants and opposite party no.2/Smt. Nishat (wife of Guljar), have entered into compromise and the said compromise has already been verified by the learned court concerned. He further submits that the certified copy of the proceeding of compromise verification report is also on record as annexure Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ashok Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Babu And 3 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) No.S.A.-1 to the supplementary affidavit. Learned counsel for the applicants further prays that in view of the compromise entered into between the applicants and opposite party no.2, the proceeding of the aforesaid case be quashed. 6. On the other hand, and learned AGA for the State has no objection to the above submissions made by learned counsel for the applicants. 7. In view of the fact that first informant namely Guljar and one of the injured namely Intzar have died and the injuries of the injured Intzar is on his right arm, which is not a vital part and the injuries suffered by the other injured namely Smt. Nishat are simple in nature. Also keeping in view the fact that applicants and opposite party no.2 have entered into compromise and the said compromise has already been verified by the learned court concerned and a report regarding verification of compromise is already on the record and taking note of the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Naushey Ali & Others Vs. State of U.P. & Another, 2025 INSC 182, and the facts of the matter, it would be in the interest of justice that the impugned proceedings be quashed, in respect of the applicants. 8. In view of the aforesaid, the entire proceeding of S.T. No.246 of 2016 (State Vs. Babu and others), arising out of Case Crime No.363 of 2015, under sections 147, 148, 149, 452, 323, 324, 307, 504, 506, IPC, Police Station Simbhawali, District Hapur, are hereby quashed. 9. The application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is hereby allowed. September 11, 2025 VKG A482 No. 9546 of 2024 2 (Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIJAY KUMAR GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad