2025:JHHC:38355 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No. 150 of 2024 1. Ranjit Prasad Choudhary, aged about 61 years, son of late Judagi Lal Choudhary; 2. Pushpa Devi, aged about 53 years, wife of Ranjit Prasad Choudhary; Both residents of Road No.3, Indrapuri, Ranchi, Police Station Sukhdeonagar, Post Hehal, Town, District Ranchi … … Petitioners/Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Commissioner, South Chhotanagpur Division, Ranchi, officiating from Kutchery Road Ranchi, Police Station Kotwali, Post G.P.O, District Ranchi 3. The Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi, officiating from New Collectorate Building, Kutchery Road, Ranchi, Police Station Kotwali, Post GPO, District Ranchi 4. The Special Officer, SAR Ranchi, officiating from New Collectorate Building, Kutchery Road, Ranchi, Police Station Kotwali, Post GPO, District Ranchi 5. The Circle Officer, Town Anchal, officiating from New Collectorate Building, Kutchery Road, Ranchi, Police Station Kotwali, Post GPO, District Ranchi 6. Mohan Munda, S/o late Jaganath Munda, R/o village Hesal P.O. Hehal, P.S. Sukhdeonagar, District Ranchi 6 B. Sohan Munda, S/o late Jagannath Munda, R/o village Hesal, P.O. Hehal + P.S. Sukhdeonagar, District Ranchi … … Respondents/Opposite Parties --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioners : Mr. Samavesh Bhanjdeo, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Sweta Shukla, AC to AAG II --- 07/19.12.2025 The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that as per tracking report of speed post-delivery, the notice issued to the opposite party nos.6 (a) and 6 (b) have been served. The learned counsel submits that in view of the tracking report of speed post, notice be accepted as validly served. 2. Considering the submissions, the notice upon the respondent nos.6 (a) and 6 (b) are accepted as validly served. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that this CMP has been filed for restoration of CMP No.387 of 2018, which 2025:JHHC:38355 2 stood dismissed on account of non-removal of defects in terms of the order dated 06.12.2019. He submits that Mr. B. P. Titerbe, Advocate was the counsel in the writ petition as well as in the CMP, but unfortunately, he expired during Covid – 19. He submits that CMP No.387 of 2018 be restored. 4. The learned counsel for the State has no serious objection so far as prayer for restoration is concerned. 5. Considering the aforesaid submissions, time for removal of defects granted in CMP No.387 of 2018 vide order dated 06.12.2019 is extended till 12.01.2026. 6. If the defects in CMP No.387 of 2018 is removed during the extended time, post CMP No.387 of 2018 on 16.01.2026. 7. This CMP is disposed of. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) 19.12.2025 Saurav/- Uploaded on :20.12.2025