SMT. MADITHADU CHANDRAKALA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/387/2024 · 2025-12-04
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40259 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40259 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010000152024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 387/2024 Between:
1. SMT. MADITHADU CHANDRAKALA, W/O RAMANJULU, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, OCC HOUSE WIFE, RESIDENT OF D.NO.38/20- 1, MITTAMEEDAPALLI H/O RAYAVARAM VILLAGE, T.SUNDUPALLI MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT AT RAYACHOTY. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, RAYACHOTY, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. 4. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, T.SUNDUPALLI POLICE STATION, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. 5. SRI BETHAPURI NAGARAJA, S/O SIDDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, RESIDENT OF THUVVAPALLI VILLAGE, K.V.PALLI MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
2
1. VUTUPALLI RAJANNA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME (AP)
3
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 387 of 2024 ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer:
“…to issue Writ, or Direction especially one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent in interfering with the construction of residential house in property admeasuring an extent of Ac.0.03 cents in Sy.No.1286, situated in Mittameedapalli H/o Rayavaram Village, T.Sundupalli Mandal, Annamayya District belonging to the petitioner is illegal, arbitrary, highhanded and violation of Article 19, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 4th respondent not to interfere with the civil disputes.…”
2. Heard Sri Vutupalli Rajanna, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that basing on the complaint made by the 5th respondent, a case in Cr.No.139 of 2023 under Sections 448, 427, 323 r/w 34 of IPC and Section 3(1)(r) (s) & 3(2) (va) of SC’s & ST’s (POA) Amendment Act, 2015 was registered against the petitioner and others. Except for the registration of the above crime, the police have never interfered in the civil disputes between the parties. 4. Recording the same, this Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed to follow the due process of law regarding the crime which was registered against the petitioner. There shall be no order as to costs.
4
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 05.12.2025. UPS
5
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.387 of 2024
Dated.05.12.2025
UPS
292