1 2025:CGHC:3231 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5105 of 2024 1 Damini Verma D/o Suresh Kumar Verma, Aged About 22 Years R/o Santoshi Para, Ward No. 11, Bemetara, Tehsil And District-Bemetara, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 Chhattisgarh Professional Examination Board, Raipur, Vyapam Bhavan, North Block, Sector-19, Atal Nagar Nava Raipur (C.G.) 2 Chairperson, Chhattisgarh Professional Examination Board Raipur, Vyapam Bhavan, North Block, Sector-19, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur (C.G.) 492001 3 Controller, Chhattisgarh Professional Examination Board Raipur, Vyapam Bhavan, North Block, Sector-19, Atal Nagar Nava Raipur (C.G.) 492001 ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Shri Kulesh Sahu, Advocate For Respondents : Ms. Akanksha Singh on behalf of Shri Avinash Singh, Advocate 2 Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board 17/01/2025 Heard. 1. By the present writ petition, the petitioner is seeking a directions towards the respondent authority to correct the date of birth of the petitioner as 01.07.2001 instead of 01.07.2002 in the TET application form and in the TET result on the basis of 10th class mark-sheet. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Teacher Eligibility Test (TET) in the year 2024 was conducted by the respondent and the petitioner submitted the OnLine form for the same. The Mark- sheet was also issued in which the petitioner was found successfully eligible. He submits that while filling of OnLine form inadvertently her date of birth has wrongly been filled as 01.07.2001 instead of 01.07.2002. He submits that the mistake was bona fide and unintentional. This petition has been filed without any delay and as soon as the petitioner realized her mistake has approached this Court and also made representation to the respondent. He further submits that if the correction is not made, it would cause prejudice to the petitioner as her date of birth has been wrongly reflected in the TET mark-sheet and by making a correction in the mark-sheet, is not going to cause any 3 loss or prejudice to the respondent and it will not make any change in the result of the petitioner. Therefore, the relief as claimed may be granted. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents, on instructions, submits that if the petitioner move a fresh representation seeking necessary correction as stated in the writ petition, the same shall be considered in accordance with law within 50 days. 4. In view of the above submissions, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent authority that, if any representation along with the documentary proof in support of her claim is filed by the petitioner for correction of the date of birth in the TET application form and its mark-sheet, the same shall be considered and decided within a period of 50 days in accordance with law. 5. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) JUDGE Gouri/Jyoti