IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.782 of 2025 ------ Shumbul Shahid @ Sambul Shahid aged about- 30 years W/O- Md. Tipu Sultan R/o village- Near Masjid Khejuria P.O.- Khejuria, P.S. & Dist.- Dumka, Jharkhand .... .... …. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Branch Manager, Jharkhand Rajya Gramin Bank, Mohanabank Branch Mohnabank, P.O.- Mohnabank P.S.- Bindapathar, District- Jamtara .... .... .... Opposite Parties ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Onkar Nath Tewary, Advocate Mr. Shamaiel Raza, Advocate For the State : Mr. Devesh Krishna, SC (Mines)-III ------ Order No.02 Dated-04-02-2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending his arrest in connection with Bindapathar P.S. Case No.78 of 2022 instituted under Section 420/406/409/467/468/471/120B of the Indian Penal Code, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in criminal conspiracy with the co-accused persons committed cheating, criminal breach of trust and forgery by withdrawing huge amount of money from different savings accounts of the depositors with Jharkhand Rajya Gramin Bank. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Drawing attention of this court towards Annexure-2 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that all the unauthorized withdrawals were made by the husband of the petitioner namely Md. Tipu Sultan from different savings accounts has been deposited with the bank and the Branch Manager of Jharkhand Rajya Gramin Bank has issued a certificate in this respect. It is then submitted that the petitioner is a female and the main allegation is against her husband namely Md. Tipu Sultan. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-12 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the investigation of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrendering, he will be enlarged on depositing Rs.10,000/- as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Jamtara in connection with Bindapathar P.S. Case No.78 of 2022 with the condition that she will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish her mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that she will not change her mobile number during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/