Sunil Kumar Methra alias Sunil Kumar Metra v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
CRLP/11160/2025 · 2025-10-29
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40245 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40245 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010575162025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 11160/2025 Between:
1. SUNIL KUMAR METHRA ALIAS SUNIL KUMAR METRA, S/O METHRA SAI MALLIKARJUNA RAOAGED ABOUT 30 YEARS,OCCUPATION SOFTWARE ENGINEER,RESIDENT H. NO 24- 51/1/1, ROAD NO 1,KAKATIYA NAGAR RAMACHANDRAPURAM,SANGA REDDY DISTRICT
2. G JYOTHIRMAYEE ALIAS JYOTHIRMAI METRA, W/O METRA SUNIL KUMAR,AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS.OCCUPATION SOFTWARE ENGINEER,RESIDENT H. NO 24-51/1/1, ROAD NO 1,KAKATIYA NAGAR RAMACHANDRAPURAM,SANGA REDDY DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AMARAVATI.
2. PENDURTHI MOUNIKA, W/O METRA ANIL KUMAR,AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS,RAJAKA, R/O PEYYERU VILLAGE,MUDINEPALLI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Courtmay be pleased to call for the records relating
2
to FIR No178 of 2025 on the file of the Mudinepalli Police Station , Eluru District , insofar as they pertain to Accused Nos 3 and 4 quash the same IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased pleased to dispense with the filing of a certified copy of the in FIR No. 178 of 2025 On the file of the Mudinepalli Police Station, Eluru District, pending disposal of the present quash petition and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased Pleased to stay all Further proceedings, in FIR No. 178 of 2025 on the file of the Mudinepalli Police Station, Eluru District, insofar as they pertain to Accused Nos. 3 and 4, pending disposal of the present quash petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S):
1. D SUDHARSHAN Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following:
3
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 11160/2025
ORDER:
The instant criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short ‘Cr.P.C)/under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) has been filed by the Petitioners/Accused Nos.3 and 4, seeking quashment of the proceedings pending against them in Crime No.178 of 2025 on the file of Mudinepalli Police Station, Eluru District, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 85 of BNS and Section 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohobition Act.
2. Heard Sri D.Sudharshan, learned counsel for the Petitioners and Ms.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the State.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petition may be disposed of by giving protection to the petitioners vide guidelines of the Hon’ble Apex Court in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar1.
4. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, on instructions, would submit that the offences registered against the petitioners are punishable with less than seven years period of imprisonment and necessary direction may be given to the concerned Station House Officer.
1 (2014) 8 SCC 273
4
5. Considering the submissions, this Criminal petition is disposed of with the following; a. Investigating Officer is at liberty to complete the investigation, in accordance with law. b. In the event of any coercive action sought to be taken against the petitioners, concerned police authorities are directed to scrupulously follow the procedure prescribed under Section 35 (3) of BNSS., [Section 41-A Cr.P.C] and the guidelines laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Arnesh Kumar’s case (supra).
6. It goes without saying that, if any charge sheet is filed in the above crime, the petitioners are at liberty to challenge the charge sheet, if they feel aggrieved by the same.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 30.10.2025 JLV
5
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 11160/2025 Dated.30.10.2025
JLV
59