Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40242 (CHH)

KARTIK RAM NETAM v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/9672/2025 · 2025-08-18

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:41751 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 9672 of 2025 1 - Kartik Ram Netam S/o Shri Usau Ram Aged About 40 Years Working As Assistant Grade- III In The Office Of Senior Agriculture Development Officer, Block Narayanpur, District- Narayanpur (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretar, Department of Agriculture Development And Farmer Welfare And Bio Technology, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director Agriculture Directorate of Agriculture, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The Joint Director Agriculture (JDA) Bastar Division District - Jagdalpur (C.G.) 4 - The Deputy Director Agriculture (DDA), District - Narayanpur (C.G.) 5 - Senior Agriculture Development Officer Block Narayanpur, District - Narayanpur (C.G.) 6 - The Collector District - Narayanpur (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Jeet Patel, Advocate. For State-Respondents : Mr. Keshav Gupta, Govt. Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 19-08-2025 Heard. 1. The petitioner has filed this petition for issuance of direction to respondent- Digitally signed by MOHAMMAD AADIL KHAN 2 transferring authority to relieve him on the grievance that though the transfer order has been issued by the State Government on 30-06-2025 (Annexure- P/1), till date he has not been relieved. 2. The issue regarding implementation of transfer order has been considered by this Court in the case of Ms. Manisha Agrawal Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Others, 2015(4) C.G.L.J.182, wherein relying upon several judgment of the Supreme Court, it has been held by this Court that once the employee has been transferred, it is required to be executed, unless it is modified, varied or cancelled by the State Government itself. 3. Therefore, in these circumstances, this petition is disposed off with the direction that the petitioner shall be relieved forthwith by the controlling authority in compliance of order dated 30-06-2025, unless the State has not modified, varied or cancelled the impugned transfer order. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Aadil