Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40241 (RAJ)

RUKMANI NANDAN SHARMA SON OF LATE SHRI LAXMANSWAROOP SHARMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/2074/2025 · 2025-05-12

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:19832] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2074/2025 Rukmani Nandan Sharma Son Of Late Shri Laxmanswaroop Sharma, Aged About 52 Years, Resident Of Vpo- Bhooda, Tehsil Raini, District Alwar (Raj). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Public Prosecutor. 2. Khemchand Somvanshi, Resident Of 2/61, Scheme No. 10-B, Alwar (Raj). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. G.S. Gouttam with Ms. Saakshi Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP with Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 12/05/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed present petition under Section 528 of B.N.S.S. seeking quashing of FIR No.505/2023 dated 04.08.2023 registered at Police Station Aravali Vihar, District Alwar, for the offence under Sections 420, 120-B of IPC. 2. It is further submitted that the petitioner is wrongly implicated in the alleged offence. Further, while placing reliance upon Annexure-2 (page-19) it is submitted that the concerned Department has tendered reasonable explanation qua the petitioners’ bonafide. 3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and upon perusal of the contents of FIR, this Court has opined that in [2025:RJ-JP:19832] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-2074/2025] the instant matter gross irregularities are traced out by the SOG in one of the public examinations, wherein, allegations are also leveled against the petitioner. 4. Therefore, this Court directs SOG investigating agency to conduct the investigation expeditiously, in accordance with law and consider all the documents including Annexure-2 during investigation and thereafter arrive at a conclusion in a fair and impartial manner. 5. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of with the aforementioned directions. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed. (SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK/29