QASIM SHAH AND OTHERS v. U T OF J AND K TH DGP AND OTHERS
CRM(M)/646/2022 · 2025-03-03
Rajnesh Oswal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4024 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4024 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CRM(M) No. 646/2022 CrlM No. 1357/2022
Qasim Shah and ors.
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None
vs
UT of J&K and ors. .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Tehseena Bukhari, Advocate vice Mr. Aseem Sawhney, Advocate
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE
ORDER 03.03.2025
1. Status report has been filed wherein it is stated that the accused persons, namely, Shenaz Shah and Rahina Kosser initially mentioned in the FIR were not found involved in the case, as such, their names were deleted from the case. It is further stated that charge sheet has been filed before the court on 09.12.2022.
2. None had appeared on behalf of the petitioners on the previous date of hearing. Same is the position today also. It seems that the petitioners have lost interest in prosecuting the present petition. Hence the present petition is dismissed for non prosecution along with connected application. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(RAJNESH OSWAL)
JUDGE
Jammu 03.03.2025 Neha-II
Serial No. 78 NEHA KUMARI 2025.03.03 17:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document