Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40239 (RAJ)

VIKAS CHAWARIYA S/O SH. SHYAMLAL v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/16850/2025 · 2025-12-19

Ravi Chirania

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:51565] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16850/2025 Vikas Chawariya S/o Sh. Shyamlal, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Sultannagar, Kachchi Basti, Gurjar Ki Thadi, Jaipur. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sikandar Singh Sakkarwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA Order 19/12/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed by the petitioner -Vikas Chawariya S/o Sh. Shyamlal, aged About 19 Years, arrested in connection with FIR No.691/2025, Police Station Mansarovar, District Jaipur City (South) for the offence under Section 305 (a) of B.N.S. 2023. 2. The petitioner’s bail application was rejected by the learned trial Court vide order dated 29.11.2025, thereafter the petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is behind the bars since 17.08.2025 and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. Learned counsel further submits that the only allegation against the applicant pertains to the stealing of mobile phones. He further submits that no recovery is required to be effected and that the investigation is almost [2025:RJ-JP:51565] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-16850/2025] complete. The charge-sheet has already been filed, and the trial is likely to take a long time. It is further submitted that the bail application of the co-accused, namely Vijay Harijan s/o Raju Harijan, has already been allowed by the learned rial Court vide order dated 26.08.2025. Therefore, he prayed that the accused petitioner may be enlarged on bail. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the present case, particularly that bail application of co-accused has already been allowed by the trial Court and charge-sheet has already been filed, this Court deems it just and proper to grant bail to the accused- petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Vikas Chawariya S/o Sh. Shyamlal shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.691/2025, Police Station Mansarovar, District Jaipur City (South), provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- along with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court for his appearance before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. The applicant is further directed not to take undue advantage of liberty or misuse the liberty. It is made clear that the observation as made by this Court in the bail application will not affect the trial of the case. (RAVI CHIRANIA),J PAYAL DHAWAN /332