172 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-8960-2025 Date of decision:28.03.2025 RAGHUNATH BANSAL ...Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESHWAR THAKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Hardeep Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Maninder Singh, Sr. DAG, Punjab. **** SURESHWAR THAKUR, J. (ORAL) 1. The learned State counsel assures this Court that till a decision is taken on the resolution of the Gram Panchayat concerned, wherebys the subject lands have been permitted to be re-alienated to the present petitioner, thereupto the impugned letter (Annexure P-9) shall remain stayed. 2. Consequently, the learned counsel for the petitioner prays prays for, and, is permitted to withdraw the instant petition. 3. However, the Approving Authority concerned, seized with the resolution of the Gram Panchayat concerned, is directed to within a period of two months from today take a lawful decision on the said resolution, but after hearing the present petitioner. In case a decision adversarial to the present petitioner is made, thereupon it is open to the present petitioner to avail all permissible remedies as per law. 4. Disposed of accordingly. (SURESHWAR THAKUR) JUDGE 28.03.2025 (VIKRAM AGGARWAL) Ithlesh JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No ITHLESH KUMAR 2025.03.31 13:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment