[2025:RJ-JP:42473] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Review Petition No. 45/2025 In S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 1708/2007 1. Smt. Sanju Doodwal Wife of Late Shri Rajesh Doodwal, Aged About 27 Years, 2. Arpan Son of Late Shri Rajesh Doodwal, Aged About 19 Years, 3. Bhola Ram, Son Of Shri Moonga Ram, Aged About 71 Years, All Resident of 23, Girnar Colony, Gandhi Path, Jaipur (Raj.). ----Petitioners Versus 1. Harmej Singh Son of Shri Puran Singh, Resident of Sarup Nagar, P.S. Samaypur Badali, District Girdaspur And At Present Resident Of Koshi Kalan, P.s. Koshi Kalan, District Mathura (U.P.). 2. Kasturi Lal Vij Son of Shri S.R. Vij, Resident of 8717, Roshan Aara Road, New Delhi-110007. 3. The United India Insurance Company Limited, Regional Office, Vishal Chamber, Tonk Road, Jaipur, Through Regional Manager. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Raaj Pal Chaudhary, Adv. for Review Petitioner (Insurance Company) For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vaibhav Jhankra, Adv. on Behalf of Mr. Sandeep Mathur, Adv. for Claimants HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI Order 15/10/2025 ;kph&chek daiuh dh vksj ls ;g iqufoZpkj ;kfpdk varxZr /kkjk 114 flfoy izfØ;k lafgrk] ,dyihB flfoy fofo/k vihy la[;k 1708@2007 latw nwnoky o vU; cuke gsejkt o vU; esa ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 28-08-2025 ij iqufoZpkj gsrq izLrqr dh x;h gSA [2025:RJ-JP:42473] (2 of 3) [CRW-45/2025] chek daiuh ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd dk cgl ds nkSjku ;g rdZ jgk gS fd mijksDr vihy esa vkns'k fnukad 28-08-2025 ikfjr djrs le; nq?kZVuk ds le; e`rd dh vk;q 31 o"kZ 8 ekg gksuk ekuk gS rFkk National Insurance Co. Vs Pranay Sethi & ors., 2017 (16) SCC 680 fofu'p; esa ikfjr fl)karksa dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, vk; gkfu dh x.kuk djrs le; 17 ds xq.kd dk iz;ksx fd;k gS] tcfd mDr fofu'p; ds vuqlkj e`rd dh vk;q 31 ls 35 o"kZ vk;qoxZ ds e/; gksus ij 16 dk xq.kd iz;ksx esa fy;k tkuk pkfg, FkkA vr% mDr vkns'k esa mijksDrkuqlkj la'kks/ku dj 17 ds xq.kd ds LFkku ij 16 dk xq.kd iz;ksx esa fy;k tkdj vkns'k ikfjr fd;k tkosA nkosnkjku ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd us mijksDr rdksZa ls lger gksrs gq, vkns'k esa la'kks/ku fd;s tkus ij vukifÙk tkfgj dhA lquk x;k rFkk i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA i=koyh ds voyksdu ls ;g Li"V gS fd vkns'k fnukad 28-08-2025 esa nq?kZVuk ds le; e`rd dh vk;q 31 o"kZ 8 ekg fu/kkZfjr dh x;h gSA ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk fofu'p; National Insurance Co. Vs Pranay Sethi & ors., 2017 (16) SCC 680 esa vfHkfu/kkZfjr fl)karksa dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, vk; gkfu dh x.kuk djrs le; 16 ds xq.kd dk iz;ksx fd;k tkuk U;k;ksfpr Fkk] ijarq Vad.kh; =qfV ds dkj.k ls 16 ds LFkku ij 17 vafdr gks tkus ls 17 ds xq.kd ds vk/kkj ij gh vk; gkfu dh x.kuk dh x;h gSA vr% ;kph&chek daiuh }kjk izLrqr iqufoZpkj ;kfpdk Lohdkj djrs gq, vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ,dyihB flfoy fofo/k vihy la[;k 1708@2007 latw nwnoky o vU; cuke gsejkt o vU; esa ikfjr vkns'k [2025:RJ-JP:42473] (3 of 3) [CRW-45/2025] fnukad 28-08-2025 esa i`"B la[;k 4 ds izFke iSjk esa tgka ^^17** dk xq.kd vafdr gS] mDr LFkku ij ^^16** dk xq.kd i<+k o le>k tkosA rn~uqlkj vk; gkfu dh x.kuk dh tkos rks ;g jkf'k 5639x12x16=10,82,688@& :i;s laxf.kr gksrh gS rFkk blesa 50 izfr'kr Hkfo"; esa vk; o`f) dk ykHk 5]41]344@& :i;s tksM+s tkus ij ;g jkf'k 16]24]032@& :i;s gksrh gS] tcfd fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk bl en esa 11]50]356@& :i;s fnyk;s gSaA vr% vk; gkfu ds en esa vihykFkhZx.k@nkosnkjku 4]73]676@& :i;s vfrfjDr izkIr djus ds vf/kdkjh gSaA bl izdkj vihykFkhZx.k@nkosnkjku dks fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk tks jkf'k fnyok;h x;h gS] mlds vfrfjDr vihykFkhZx.k@nkosnkjku ijEijkxr 'kh"kZdksa esa c<+ksrjh dh x;h jkf'k 1]64]500@& :i;s lfgr dqy 6]38]176@& :i;s vfrfjDr :i ls izkIr djus ds vf/kdkjh gSaA vkns'k fnukad 28-08-2025 dh 'ks"k 'krsaZ ;Fkkor jgsaxhA bl vkns'k dks vkns'k fnukad 28-08-2025 dk vfHkUu Hkkx ekuk tkos rFkk mDr vkns'k ds lkFk i<+k tkosA (CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI),J MANISH SAINI /05 (S)