Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40228 (CHH)

SHRIRAM RAJWADE v. SHRI AMIT KATARIYA

CONT/1382/2025 · 2025-09-02

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:CGHC:44880 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 1382 of 2025 Shriram Rajwade S/o Shri Soharram Rajwade Aged About 48 Years Dispensary Servant, Government Ayurved Dispensary Gangoti, District -Surajpur, (C.G.) R/o Village Nawabandh, Post Karji (Darima Road), Police Station Darima, Tehsil And District- Ambikapur, (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Shri Amit Katariya Through The Secretary, Health And Family Welfare Department, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur, (C.G.) 2 - Shikha Rajput Tiwari Director Ayurved, Yog Evam Prakritik Chikitsa Sidha, Yunani Evam Homeopathi (Aayush), Raipur, District- Raipur, (C.G.) 3 - S. Jaivardhana Collector Surajpur District - Surajpur(C.G.) 4 - Kamlesh Nandini Sahu The Then Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Surajpur District- Surajpur, (C.G.) Presetly Posted As Additional Collector Janjgir District - Janjgir - Champa (C.G.) 5 - Vijendra Singh Patle Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Surajpur, District- Surajpur (C.G.) 6 - Dr. Abbul Faiz Zila Ayurved Officer Surajpur District- Surajpur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) (Cause title is taken from the CIS) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner : Shri Ramesh Kumar Nayak, Advocate For Respondents : Shri Vinay Pandey, Dy AG ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 03.09.2025 1. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that representation of the petitioner has already been decided. Therefore, he does not want to press the present Contempt Petition, and prays for its withdrawal. 2. Accordingly, petition is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) JUDGE padma Digitally signed by V PADMAVATHI Date: 2025.09.12 15:57:23 +0530