Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40228 (AP)

GANDI SATYANARAYANA v. SMT VIJAYA KRISHNAN

CC/1965/2025 · 2025-11-26

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010387952025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1965 OF 2025 Between: 1. GANDI SATYANARAYANA, S/O. GANDI RAJU NAIDU, AGED 62 YEARS, R/O. AMRUTAPURAM, SADDAMAPTTI VEEDI, SABBAVARAM MANDAL ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. 2. SUREDDYSATYAVAMMA, W/O LATE APPALA NAIDU, AGED 74 YEARS, R/O. AMRUTAPURAM, SADDAMAPTTI VEEDI, SABBAVARAM MANDAL ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. 3. GANDI SATTIBABU, S/O. LATE DEVUDU, AGED 60 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 2-52, BESIDE MAIN ROAD, SABBAVARAM MANDAL, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. SMT VIJAYA KRISHNAN, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. 2. KUM SHAIK AAISHA, THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ANAKAPALLI, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. 3. SRI B CHINNI KRISHNA, THE TAHSILDAR, SABBAVARAM, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT ...CONTEMNOR(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. V V SATISH Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA The Court made the following ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri Y. Nagendra, Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri V.V. Satish, Ld. Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and Ms. G. Prasanthi, Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of Nagaraju Pullagura, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3. 2. Ld. Counsel for the Respondents submits that in compliance with the Orders of this Court dated 20.02.2025 in W.P.No.4268 of 2025, the District Collector, Anakapalli (Respondent No.1) has issued the Proceedings. Ld. Counsel for the Respondents has supplied copy of the Proceedings issued by the District Collector, Anakapalli bearing Computer No.85182/2024/L2, Dt.30.09.2025. Copy of it has been served on the Ld. Counsel for the Petitioner and the same is taken on record. 3. Though the District Collector, Anakapalli (Respondent No.1) has passed the Order on 30.09.2025, Ld. Counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions, submits that this Order has been served on the Petitioners only today. Although, there is delay on the part of the Respondents in communicating this said Order, this Court is of the view that the Respondents have substantially complied with this Order of this Court. 4. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. 5. Needless to state that the Petitioners are always at liberty to challenge the Proceedings of the District Collector, Anakapalli (Respondent No.1) bearing Computer No.85182/2024/L2, Dt.30.09.2025. 6. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 27.11.2025 Mnr 73 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD Contempt Case No.1965 OF 2025 Dt.27.11.2025 Mnr