Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40226 (AP)

Smt.Ch.Lokeswari v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/19075/2020 · 2025-12-22

V Sujatha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010288662020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 19075/2020 Between: 1. SMT.CH.LOKESWARI, W/O.CH.NAGARAJ HINDU, AGED 40 YEARS OCC FAIR PRICE SHOP DEALER SHOP NO.54(11-A) RFO.RAJA RAJESWARI NAGAR ADONI, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ANDHRA PRADESH ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY CONSUMER AFFAIRS, FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES DEPARTMENT A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT, AP 3. THE JOINT COLLECTOR CIVIL SUPPLIES WING, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT, AP 4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, CIVIL SUPPLIES WING, KURNOOL KURNOOL DISTRICT, AP 5. THE TAHSILDAR, CIVIL SUPPLIES WING ADONI, KURNOOL DISTRICT, AP ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court 2 VS,J W.P.NO.19075 OF 2020 may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in dismissing the revision vide proceedings No.CS3/18/2016 Dt.14-11-2019 by confirming the orders passed by the 3rd respondent vide proceedings No.CS3/107/20 15 dt.11-12-2015 and proceedings passed by the 4111 respondent vide Rc.M.426/2015 dt.09- 03- 2015 as being highly illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, unconstitutional and violation of Art.14, 19 (1) (g) and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently to set aside the same and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the orders passed vide proceedings No.CS3/18/2016 dt.14-01-2019 by the 2nd Respondent herein and direct the respondent No.2 to continue the petitioner as Fair Price Shop Dealer for the F.P. Shop No.54 (11-A) of Raja Rajeswari Nagar, Adoni, Kurnol District by supplying essential commodities pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. THOTA SUNEETHA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following: 3 VS,J W.P.NO.19075 OF 2020 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 19075/2020 ORDER:- When the matter was listed on 25.11.2025 and 10.12.2025 there was no representation for the petitioner. Even, today also there is no representation for the petitioner. It shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case. 2. In view of the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date :23.12.2025 JLV 4 VS,J W.P.NO.19075 OF 2020 184 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 19075/2020 Dt.23.12.2025 JLV