102 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Subhash Gangoli State of Haryana CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present: Mr. Ms. Tanushree Gupta, DAG, Haryana. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA The petition has been filed the respondents death threat through whatsapp 2. Learned 18.04.2025 filed on behalf of the respondents to contend that after a thorough investigation, no threat paragraphs of the report are as under: 2. Police, CID Haryana, a threat assessment was conducted regarding the petitioner's carried out by the police, it was found that no fresh complaint had been made by the petitioner regarding any threat to his life or liberty. Furthermore, no such threat was revealed from secret sources either. The Superintendent of Police, detailed point IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-3101 Date of Decision :29.04.2025 Subhash Gangoli Versus f Haryana and Others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Mr. Harshit Joon, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Tanushree Gupta, DAG, Haryana. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (ORAL) The petition has been filed seeking a writ of to protect the petitioner’s life and liberty threat through whatsapp message and internet call on 27/28.06.202 Learned State counsel has referred to the status filed on behalf of the respondents to contend that after a thorough no threat has been found against the petitioner. Relevant paragraphs of the report are as under: 2. That, on the instructions of the Additional Director General of Police, CID Haryana, a threat assessment was conducted regarding the petitioner's representation. During the course carried out by the police, it was found that no fresh complaint had been made by the petitioner regarding any threat to his life or liberty. Furthermore, no such threat was revealed from secret sources either. The Superintendent of Police, detailed point-wise report bearing No. 2431/B dated 19.01.2025, IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 3101-2025 Decision :29.04.2025 …Petitioner ….Respondents HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Tanushree Gupta, DAG, Haryana. seeking a writ of mandamus directing life and liberty who statedly received message and internet call on 27/28.06.2022. counsel has referred to the status report dated filed on behalf of the respondents to contend that after a thorough found against the petitioner. Relevant That, on the instructions of the Additional Director General of Police, CID Haryana, a threat assessment was conducted regarding . During the course of the inquiry carried out by the police, it was found that no fresh complaint had been made by the petitioner regarding any threat to his life or liberty. Furthermore, no such threat was revealed from secret sources either. The Superintendent of Police, Jind, submitted a wise report bearing No. 2431/B dated 19.01.2025, directing who statedly received dated filed on behalf of the respondents to contend that after a thorough found against the petitioner. Relevant That, on the instructions of the Additional Director General of Police, CID Haryana, a threat assessment was conducted regarding of the inquiry carried out by the police, it was found that no fresh complaint had been made by the petitioner regarding any threat to his life or liberty. Furthermore, no such threat was revealed from secret Jind, submitted a PUSHPINDER SAINI 2025.04.29 18:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-3101-2025 annexed herewith as Annexure R General of Police, CID Haryana, concluding therein that no threat exists to the petitioner, Shri Subhash Gangoli 3. That it is further submitted that the petitioner, Shri Subhash Gangoli, Ex security or bodyguards at his own expense. 3. In view thereof, there is no ground stands disposed of liberty to bring th take appropriate action in accordance with law. April 29, 2025 ps 2025 -2- annexed herewith as Annexure R General of Police, CID Haryana, concluding therein that no threat exists to the petitioner, Shri Subhash Gangoli 3. That it is further submitted that the petitioner, Shri Subhash Gangoli, Ex-MLA, Safidon, has also refused to accept personal security or bodyguards at his own expense. In view thereof, there is no ground stands disposed of. In case the petitioner faces any threat liberty to bring this fact to the notice of the respondents take appropriate action in accordance with law. April 29, 2025 Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable annexed herewith as Annexure R-1, to the Additional Director General of Police, CID Haryana, concluding therein that no threat exists to the petitioner, Shri Subhash Gangoli, Ex-MLA, Safidon. 3. That it is further submitted that the petitioner, Shri Subhash MLA, Safidon, has also refused to accept personal security or bodyguards at his own expense. In view thereof, there is no ground to entertain the petition and it s any threat in future, he will be at respondents, who will thereupon (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No 1, to the Additional Director General of Police, CID Haryana, concluding therein that no threat 3. That it is further submitted that the petitioner, Shri Subhash MLA, Safidon, has also refused to accept personal and it at thereupon TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) PUSHPINDER SAINI 2025.04.29 18:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document