Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40222 (RAJ)

GANESH VAISHANAV S/O SITARAM v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/6622/2025 · 2025-11-13

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6622/2025 Ganesh Vaishanav S/o Sitaram, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Devta Tehsil Boli District Sawai Madhopur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. Biharilal S/o Maddulal, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Tond, Malarna Dungar, Sawai Madhopur (Raj). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Harshita Sharma for Dr. Mahesh Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, PP Mr. Rajendra Singh Tanwar JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 13/11/2025 1. By way of filing this petition, a prayer has been made for quashing of FIR No.45/2024 registered with Police Station Malarna Dungar, District Sawai Madhopur on the basis of compromise. 2. This Court vide order dated 29.10.2025 directed the parties to appear before the Investigating Officer for verification of the compromise. 3. In pursuance of the aforesaid order, the parties have appeared before the Investigating Officer, where the complainant has submitted the compromise to the extent of disposal of bail application submitted by the accused. No such (2 of 2) [CRLMP-6622/2025] compromise has been submitted by the complainant for closing the proceedings arising out of the impugned FIR. 4. Even the compromise enclosed with this petition i.e., Annexure-2 also reveals the same facts, wherein also there is no assertion of closing the matter on the basis of compromise. The contents indicate that the application was submitted to the extent of grant of bail in favour of the petitioner. 5. Considering the above, this petition cannot be entertained for quashing of FIR on the basis of compromise between the parties. 6. Accordingly, the instant criminal misc. petition is dismissed. The stay application and all pending applications, if any, also stand dismissed. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/35