( 2025:JHHC:32621 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 6184 of 2025 Shekh Ahmad, aged about 41 years, son of Shekh Suleman, resident of village-Madanpur, P.O. and P.S. Nirsa, District-Dhanbad ...... … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. … Opposite Party -------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioner :Mr. Mahesh Tewari, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Ruby Pandey, A.P.P. 04/ 30.10.2025: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Nirsa P.S. Case No. 247 of 2023, registered under sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 307, 354B, 379, 504, 506 of the I.P.C, pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Dhanbad or his successor Court. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that earlier petitioner has moved in A.B.A. No.2/2024 which was rejected by order dated 07.03.2024. He further submits that now fresh ground is that chargesheet has not been submitted and in view of that second anticipatory bail application has been preferred. He then submits that anticipatory bail of the other co-accused persons has been allowed and anticipatory bail of the petitioner has been rejected. He further submits that there is no injury and in view of that petitioner may kindly be provided privilege of anticipatory bail. 4. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer and submits that earlier the anticipatory bail application of the petitioner has been rejected and there is no fresh ground. 5. It appears that earlier the anticipatory bail of the petitioner has been rejected. In the said application others have been granted anticipatory bail, however, the anticipatory bail of the petitioner was rejected. There is no ( 2025:JHHC:32621 ) change of circumstance and if there is no change of circumstance, second anticipatory bail application is not maintainable. All these grounds have been considered in earlier anticipatory bail application. As such, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed. 6. However, if the petitioner moves before the learned court for regular bail the same shall be considered by the learned court without being prejudice to this order. Dt.30.10.2025 ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) satyarthi-