Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44739 CRP No. 198 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 198 OF 2021 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. H SHARADAMMA W/O LATE B. GOPALAIAH AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS,
2.
SMT. G SHILPA W/O T.N. MANJUNATH AND D/O LATE B. GOPALAIAH AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,
3.
SRI. T.N. MANJUNATH S/O T.V. NAGARAJ AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO.13/65, 3RD FLOOR, 15TH CROSS, 5TH MAIN, SUBBARAJU LAYOUT, LAKKASANDRA, BENGALURU - 560 030. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SHASHANK S, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
SMT. G SMITHA W/O P.K. SURESH KUMAR AND D/O LATE B. GOPALAIAH AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
2.
SRI. P.K. SURESH KUMAR S/O LATE P.S.K NAIDU AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44739 CRP No. 198 of 2021
3.
BABY ANUSHKA K S D/O P.K. SURESH KUMAR SINCE MINOR REPRESENTED BY SMT. G. SMITHA ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO.13/65, 2ND FLOOR, 15TH CROSS, 5TH MAIN, SUBBARAJU LAYOUT LAKKASANDRA, BENGALURU - 560 030. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SURESH S, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3)
THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CPC 1908 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 17.10.2020 PASSED ON IA No.7 IN OS.No.4742/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE XXV ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU, REJECTING THE IA No.7 FILED UNDER ORDER VII RULE 11(a) AND (d) OF CPC FOR REJECTION OF PLAINT.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER
After addressing the arguments for some time,
learned counsel for the revision petitioner has filed a memo. The memo reads as under:
"The undersigned counsel for petitioners most respectfully submits that the petitioners may kindly be allowed to withdraw this petition with liberty reserved to the p s to question the impugned order in an appeal that may be filed against any judgment that may be passed, in the interest of justice and equity.”
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44739 CRP No. 198 of 2021
Placing the memo on record, revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, if the finding recorded in the impugned
order goes against him, in the main suit, which is now posted for arguments, revision petitioner is permitted to urge in the grounds of appeal and assail the finding recorded in the impugned order as well. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE KAV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 51