Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4022 (PNJ)

GOLDY SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/32583/2025 · 2026-03-16

Aman Chaudhary

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 115 CRM-M-30643-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 16.03.2026 Amritpal Singh ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CRM-M-32583-2025 (O&M) Goldy Singh ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY ***** Present : Ms. Manpreet Ghuman, Advocate for the petitioner in CRM-M-30643-2025 Mr. Amaninder Preet, Advocate for the petitioner in CRM-M-32583-2025        ***** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned State counsel submits that out of 19 prosecution witnesses, 9 have been given up, while 7 stands examined and only 2 more remain, in view of which, learned counsel for the petitioners does not press the petitions, however, pray for a direction to the trial Court to decide the case in a time bound manner. 2. Ordered accordingly. MOHIT 2026.03.16 17:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-30643-2025 (O&M) & CRM-M-32583-2025 (O&M) -2- 3. The trial Court is requested to make an endeavour to conclude the case expeditiously, preferably within a period of 3 months, in accordance with law. 4.       (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE 16.03.2026 M.Kamra Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No MOHIT 2026.03.16 17:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document