Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40201 (JHR)

DEBA MANDAL ALLIAS DEVA MANDAL v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./8264/2025 · 2025-09-25

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:29959] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8264 of 2025 Deba Mandal @ Deva Mandal , aged about 22 years, son of Shyampad Mandal, Resident of Village Raghunathpur Tola, Ratanpur, Post Kandra, Police Station Kandra, District Seraikella Kharsawan … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. party Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioner : Mr. Vikash Kumar ,Adv. For the State : Mr. Tarun Kumar , Addl. PP. 02 / 25.09.2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Kandra P. S. case no. 08 of 2025 instituted under Section 309 (4) of BNS, 2023. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner committed robbery and looted mobile phone, wallet, ATM card, Aadhar Card, PAN card and assaulted the informant, causing injuries to him. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false and the petitioner is not named in the FIR and the charge sheet has been submitted in this case. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has not been put on TIP as yet as mentioned in paragraph 9 of the bail application and the petitioner has been in jail custody since 20.03.2025. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the trial of the case and undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case, hence, the petitioner may be admitted on regular bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposed the prayer for regular bail . Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M., Seraikella in connection with Kandra P. S. case no. 08 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioner will not annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case and will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case. (ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.) Dated 25.09.2025 Smita/-