Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40197 (RAJ)

MEHTAB SINGH CHARAN, S/O PRAHLAD SINGH CHARAN v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/15170/2025 · 2025-11-18

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:46542] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15170/2025 Mehtab Singh Charan, S/o Prahlad Singh Charan, Aged About 28 Years, Residing At House No. 53/2 Rajendra Nagar, Agar Road, Ujjain, District Ujjain, Madhya Pradesh- 456001 ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Personal, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Jaipur, State Institute Of Agricultural Management Campus, Durgapura, Jaipur Through Its Director. 3. The Department Of Agriculture, (Watershed Development And Soil Conservation Department) Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur Through Secretary ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Yudhister Ratnoo For Respondent(s) : Mr. Nalin G. Narayan Mr. Narendra Singh Choudhary HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 18/11/2025 1. Ms. Tulika Saini, Secretary, Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Jaipur is present is person and she submits that in pursuant to order dated 17.11.2025, Mr. Nalin G. Narayan has been assigned the Work of Penal Counsel to accept notice on behalf of respondent No.2. She further submits that other counsels appointed on behalf of respondent No.2 will also be available during Court hours to receive advance copy. [2025:RJ-JP:46542] (2 of 3) [CW-15170/2025] 2. The statement of Secretary, Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Jaipur is taken on record and now, she has is not required to remain present in future in the instant matter. 3. Instant writ petition has been preferred with following prayer; It is, therefore, most humbly prayed that the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to accept and allow the petition by issuing writ, order or direction to give the appointment to the petitioner at the post of Junior Engineer (Agriculture) with all consequential benefits according to the petitioner’s original merit and; The Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent to assign notional seniority to the petitioner above the candidate who is immediately junior to him in the merit list, subject to the final outcome of the present writ petition. 4. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents-Authority to consider and resolve his grievances. 5. Mr. Nalin G. Narayan accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2, whereas Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC on behalf of respondent No.1 and Mr. B.S. Chhaba, AAG on behalf of respondent No.3. 6. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the [2025:RJ-JP:46542] (3 of 3) [CW-15170/2025] petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 7. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /389-S