APHC010656142022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] MONDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 39073/2022 Between: 1. KUNCHEPU GANGOJIMMA, W/O. LATE KUNCHEPU GANGANNA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, H.NO. 14-402, MURTHIPALLI, KADIRI TOWN, SRI SATYASAI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE (ASSISGNMENTS) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SRI SATYSAI DISTRICT AT PUTTAPARTHI. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, KADIRI MANDAL, SRI SATYSAI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, declaring the action of the respondents in trying to dispossess the petitioner from her property situated in Sy.No. 1-1 to an extent of Ac. 0.63 cent situated at Kadiri Village and Mandal, Sri Satysai District for the purpose of allotment of house sites under Navaratnalu Scheme, as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to Provisions of Land Acquistion Act, 2013 and violative of Art. 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently DIRECT the respodnents not to dispossess the petitioner from her property 2 HBKM,J W.P.No.39073 of 2022 situated in Sy.No. 1-1 to an extent of Ac. 0.63 cent situated at Kadiri Village and Mandal, Sri Satysai District and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to DIRECT the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from her property situated in Sy.No. 1-1 to an extent of Ac. 0.63 cent situated at Kadiri Village and Mandal, Sri Satysai District, pending disposal of above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M PRASADA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 3 HBKM,J W.P.No.39073 of 2022 The Court made the following Order: On the last occasion i.e., on 06.10.2025, it was noted that the learned counsel on record is no more and the petitioner was given an opportunity to make an alternative arrangement before the next date of hearing. But when the matter is listed today, there is no representation for the petitioner either in person or through her counsel. 2. In view of the same, this Writ Petition is dismissed for default. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN 03.11.2025 PGT