Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40192 (AP)

Mareedu Vishnu Narayana v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/13379/2024 · 2025-12-02

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010267252024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 13379/2024 Between: 1. MAREEDU VISHNU NARAYANA, S/O GOVINDA RAJULU, AGED ABOUT YEARS, R/O D.NO. FLAT NO. 401, VISHNU TOWERS, GOWDURAMALAYAMVEEDHI, YENAMALAKUDURU, KRISHNA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GANNAVARAM CIRCLE, GANNAVARAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PENAMALURU POLICE STATION, PENAMALURU, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. KILARU SUDHAKAR, S/O NARASIMHA RAO, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 23-168, NEAR PANCHAYAT OFFICE, YENAMALAKUDURU, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be 2 pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring inaction of the 2nd and 3rd Respondents in considering the representation of the petitioner dated 01.05.2024 in view of the complaint given to the 4th respondent dated 11.04.2024 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents to take action by considering the petitioner's representation dated 01.05.2024 in view of the complaint dated 11.04.2024 IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to dispose of the representation of the petitioner dated 01.05.2024 in view of the complaint dated 11.04.2024 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PRATHIWADA VARUN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 13379 of 2024 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer: “…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring inaction of the 2nd and 3rd Respondents in considering the representation of the petitioner dated 01.05.2024 in view of the complaint given to the 4th respondent dated 11.04.2024 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents to take action by considering the petitioner's representation dated 01.05.2024 in view of the complaint dated 11.04.2024.…” 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Prathiwada Varun Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that no further orders are required in this matter, since FIR has been registered. 3. Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 4. Recording the same, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 03.12.2025. UPS 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.13379 of 2024 Dated.03.12.2025 UPS 326