Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40191 (AP)

Palli Kumar Raja, v. MVV Kishore,

CC/1245/2025 · 2025-11-13

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010219782025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] FRIDAY,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1245/2025 Between: 1. PALLI KUMAR RAJA,, S/O. ADIYYA, AGED 46 YEARS, R/O. D. NO.4- 181, VANAPALLI, KOTHAPALLI MANDAL, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. MVV KISHORE, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, DRAINAGE SUB DIVISION, KAKINADA, KAKINADA DISTRICT. 2. ANIL KUMAR SINGHAL, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. R MAHESH KUMAR, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT, AMALAPURAM. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondent under Sec.10 to 12 of Contempt of Court Act for deliberate and willful violation of the orders dated 27-11-2023 passed in WP. No. 19547 of 2023 passed by this Hon'ble Court Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T V S PRABHAKARA RAO Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. T S RAYALU The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO:1245/2025 ORDER: This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders dated 27.11.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.19547 of 2023. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the respondents submits that the orders dated 27.11.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.19547 of 2023 are complied with and also issued proceedings dated 10.11.2025 to that effect. Therefore, no cause survives and no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not refute the submission made by the learned counsel for the respondents. Recording the same, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 14.11.2025 BSP 71 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA (closed) Contempt Case No.1245 of 2025 14.11.2025 BSP