133 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-9064-2025 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION : 30.04.2025 VIKRANT ... PETITIONER V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSH BUNGER Present: Mr. Parminder Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Upasana Dhawan, AAG Haryana, * * * HARSH BUNGER , J. (ORAL) Petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, herein is, inter alia, for issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus to direct the respondents to consider the representation dated 24.01.2025 (Annexure P-1) submitted by the petitioner in respect of encroachment made on the pretext of construction of a new building by respondent No.5 without sanction of map of building. 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant writ petition with liberty to file a fresh one with better particulars. 3. Keeping in view the aforesaid submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. 4. All pending application(s), if any, shall also stand closed. 30.04.2025 (HARSH BUNGER) Janki JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No JANKI BHATT 2025.05.01 13:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh