Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40189 (KAR)

SRI MAHESH KUMAR v. SRI CHALUVARAJU

WA/899/2024 · 2025-11-04

C M Poonacha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46016-DB WA No. 899 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA WRIT APPEAL NO. 899 OF 2024 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SRI MAHESH KUMAR S/O. NANDA KISHORE AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.39/1-1 10TH CROSS, PIPELINE ROAD CHOLARAPALYA BENGALURU - 560 025 …APPELLANT (BY SRI/SMT.: AKSHATHA SHETTY K., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI CHALUVARAJU S/O. LATE MARICHALUVE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 2. SRI RAMESH S/O. LATE MARICHALUVE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS 3. SRI YOGESH S/O. LATE MARICHALUVE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS Digitally signed by SRIDEVI S Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46016-DB WA No. 899 of 2024 4. SRI NARASEGOWDA S/O. LATE DASEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS 5. SRI MARIDASEGOWDA S/O. LATE DASEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS 6. SRI SINGEGOWDA S/O LATE DASEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS 7. SRI KULLEGOWDA S/O LATE DASEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDEING OF HOSA HUNDAVADI VILLAGE BELAGOLA HOBLI SRIRANGAPATNA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 438 8. SMT. YASHODAMMA W/O. THIPPE GOWDA RESIDING AT SEETHAPURA VILLAGE CHINAKURALI HOBLI PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 401 …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 18/01/2024 PASSED IN WRIT PETITION NO.24501/2017 (GM-CPC) AND TO ALLOW THE IMPLEADING APPLICATION FILED BY THE APPELLANT & ETC. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46016-DB WA No. 899 of 2024 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE) 1. For the reasons stated in the application - I.A.No.1/2025, the same is allowed and the order dated 18.02.2025 is recalled and the appeal is restored to file. 2. Memo dated 04.11.2025 has been filed seeking withdrawal of the appeal. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant seeks to unconditionally withdraw the present appeal. 3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (VIBHU BAKHRU) CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- (C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE SD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 66