- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43713 CRP No. 244 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 244 OF 2019 (IO) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. TEJRAJ GULECHA S/O. PUKHRAJ, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/AT NO.40/A, CLASSIC ORCHARDS, BEHIND MEENAKSHI TEMPLE, BANNERGHATTA ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 076 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RADHANANDAN B.S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. ANUSHA P D/O SMT.RANI, W/O. RAVIKUMAR R. AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, R/AT NO.205, ANNESHWARA VILLAGE, ANNESHWARA POST, DEVANAHALLI TALUK - 562 110. 2. SRI.NITHIN @ NITHIN GOWDA R. A/O SMT. RANI, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, R/AT NO.8, RACHENAHALLI ROAD, THANISANDRA, S.R.K. NAGAR POST - 560 077. Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43713 CRP No. 244 of 2019 3. SMT. RANI W/O. PARTHASARATHY, S/O. A. VIAJAYANARAYANA GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, 4. SMT. PRABHA @ PRABHAVATHI W/O SHIVANNA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, 5. SRI.SONNE GOWDA S/O A. VIJAYANARAYANA GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, RESPONDENTS NO.3 TO 5 ARE R/AT 161, KASTURI NIVASA ROAD, THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK, BANGALORE - 560 056. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. ALFRED, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. KAMALACHARAN S.R., ADVOCATE FOR R1 (NOC) SRI. S.M. PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3 NOTICE TO R4 AND R5 DISPENSED WITH) THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF THE CPC., 1908 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 06.02.2019 PASSED ON IA NO.1/18 IN OS NO.8502/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE XXXIV ADDL.CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JDUGE, BENGALURU REJECTING IA NO.1/18 FILED UNDER ORDER VII RULE 11[a] AND [d] OF CPC., FOR REJECTION OF PLAINT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43713 CRP No. 244 of 2019 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER After addressing the arguments for some time, learned counsel for the revision petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition by filing a memo. Memo reads as under: “The petitioner respectfully submits that the petition is not pressed and the same may be dismissed as withdrawn by seeking liberty to urge all the contentions in the Trial Court in the interest of justice and equity.” Placing the memo on record, revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to canvass all favourable points in the pending suit in accordance with law. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE KAV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 15 CT-SG