- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48311 CRP No. 280 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 280 OF 2022 (EX) BETWEEN: 1. KALEEM PASHA S/O SRI MOHAMMED AMIR AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS R/AT NO 1816, 1ST A CROSS SS PURAM TUMKURU - 572 102 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NATARAJ G.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. M/S TIPPU CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD 1ST MAIN ROAD NEW MANDIPET TUMKURU - 572 101 REP BY PRESIDENT MOHAMMED SAFEERULLA …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. RAMESH K.R.,ADVOCATE) THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CPC AGAINST THE ORDER DATE 26.03.2022 PASSED IN EX.No.66/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, TUMAKURU, AS CLOSED THE EXECUTION PETITION. Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48311 CRP No. 280 of 2022 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FURTHER ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER 1. Heard on merits by consent of the parties. 2. Decree Holder is the revision petitioner being aggrieved by closure of Execution Case No.56/2013. 3. Sri. Nataraj would submit that pending execution, the interest amount is not paid by the Judgment Debtor and so also the cost imposed by this Court in CRP No.178/2014 is not paid by the judgment debtor. If it is so, the decree holder can recover it by filing successive execution petition. 4. Counsel for the respondent submits that such an execution petition is already filed. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48311 CRP No. 280 of 2022 5. Reserving the liberty to the decree holder to recover the interest and cost in the pending execution petition, the following Order is passed: ORDER (i) Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. (ii) Question of payment of interest to be decided by the executing Court and this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the matter with regard to the claim of interest. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE SNC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 24 CT-SG