APHC010388102024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) SATURDAY,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 19991 OF 2024 Between: 1. NAGA SRINIVASA REDDY, S/o Subba Reddy, aged about 42 years, Occ Business, R/o Plot No.71, Visveshwaraiah Colony, Hastinapuram, B.N. Reddy, Ranga Reddy District. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Building, Secretariat, Velagaputi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The Director General of Police, Andhra Pradesh State, O/o Mangalagiri, Guntur District. 3. The Superintendent of Police, Palnadu, Palnadu District, (Erstwhile Guntur District). 4. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, O/o Narsaraopeta Division, Palnadu District. 5. The Circle Inspector of Police, Karampudi Rural Circle, Karampudi, Palnadu District. 6. The Station House Officer, Karampudi Police Station, Palnadu, Palnadu District. 7. TatireddyVenkataRamana, W/o TatireddyVenkatesh, aged about 38 years, Occ Cosmetologist and Beautician R/o H.No.5-9-470/2/8, Rock View Villas, Sai Krishna Enclave, Pahse-ll, Yapral, Medchal-Malkajgiri District. 8. MekalaLachi Reddy, S/o Anmireddy, aged about 58 years, Occ. Business, R/o PedaKodamagundia Village, Karampudi Mandal, Palnadu District. 9. Mekala Siva Malla Reddy, S/o Latchi Reddy, aged about 34 years, Occ Doctor, R/o PedaKodamagundia Village, Karampudi Mandal, Palnadu District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent Nos.5 and 6 in interfering into the peaceful life and liberty of the petitioner and also interfering into the matrimonial life between the petitioners brother-in-law and the respondent No.7 and trespassing into the house of the petitioner and creating panic situation illegally took the petitioner to the Karampudi Police Station, detaining him and created panic situation, threatened with dire consequences and obtained 8 promissory notes and 4 cheques from the petitioner by forcibly, threatening and blackmailing to pay an amount of Rs.70 Lakhs of Rupees to the respondent No.7 the same was denied by the petitioner, due to which the respondent Nos.5 and 6 is trying to remand the petitioner to the judicial custody, by colluding with the respondent Nos.7 to 9 highly illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutiona l, violation of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent Nos.5 and 6 not to interfere into the peaceful life and liberty of the petitioner and also not to interfere into the matrimonial life between the petitioners brother-in-law and the respondent No.7 and not to create panic detaining him and created panic situation. threatened with dire consequences and obtained 8 promissory notes and 4cheques from the petitioner by forcibly, threatening and blackmailing to pay an amount of Rs.70 Lakhs of Rupees to the respondent No.7 the same was denied by the petitioner, due to which the respondent Nos.5 and 6 not to remand the petitioner to the judicial custody, by colluding with the respondent Nos.7 to 9 and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondent Nos.5 and 6 not to interfere into the peaceful life and liberty of the petitioner and also not to interfere into the matrimonial life between the petitioner’s brother-in-law and the respondent No.7 and not to create panic , detaining him and created panic situation, threatened with dire consequences and obtained 8 promissory notes and 4 cheques from the petitioner by forcibly, threatening and blackmailing to pay an amount of Rs.70 Lakhs of Rupees to the respondent No.7 the same was denied by the petitioner, due to which the respondent Nos.5 and 6 not to remand the petitioner to the judicial custody, by colluding with the respondent Nos.7 to 9 pending disposal of the writ petition and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: RAPOLU BHASKAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondents:S DUSHYANTH REDDY THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 19991 OF 2024 The Court made the following order: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent Nos.5 and 6 in interfering into the peaceful life and liberty of the petitioner and also interfering into the matrimonial life between the petitioners brother-in-law and the respondent No.7 and trespassing into the house of the petitioner and creating panic situation illegally took the petitioner to the Karampudi Police Station, detaining him and created panic situation, threatened with dire consequences and obtained 8 promissory notes and 4 cheques from the petitioner by forcibly, threatening and blackmailing to pay an amount of Rs.70 Lakhs of Rupees to the respondent No.7 the same was denied by the petitioner, due to which the respondent Nos.5 and 6 is trying to remand the petitioner to the judicial custody, by colluding with the respondent Nos.7 to 9 highly illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, violation of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent Nos.5 and 6 not to interfere into the peaceful life and liberty of the petitioner and also not to interfere into the matrimonial life between the petitioners brother-in-law and the respondent No.7 and not to create panic detaining him and created panic situation. threatened with dire consequences and obtained 8 promissory notes and 4cheques from the petitioner by forcibly, threatening and blackmailing to pay an amount of Rs.70 Lakhs of Rupees to the respondent No.7 the same was denied by the petitioner, due to which the respondent Nos.5 and 6 not to remand the petitioner to the judicial custody, by colluding with the respondent Nos.7 to 9 and pass such 2. No representation for the petitioner. 3. Sri P. Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, would submit that the police are not interfering in the matrimonial disputes between the parties. The learned Assistant Government Pleader would further submit that the writ affidavit itself discloses that there is a criminal case between the parties relating to an offence under Section 498-A IPC. It is further submitted that the police have neither threatened the petitioners nor visited their house nor obtained any promissory notes, as alleged. 4. Recording the same, this Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed to follow due process of law regarding the crime which is registered against the petitioner. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 20.12.2025. KKV HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 19991 OF 2024 Dated.20.12.2025 KKV 54 HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AMARAVATI MAIN CASE NO: WRIT PETITION NO: 19991 OF 2024 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No. Date ORDER OFFICE NOTE 2. 20.12.2025 Dr.VJP,J The Writ Petition is disposed of. (Vide separate order) ________ Dr.VJP, J KKV