Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40180 (AP)

Sri Takala Kasivisweswara Rao v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/21821/2021 · 2025-11-17

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010358522021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] TUESDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 21821/2021 Between: 1. SRI TAKALA KASIVISWESWARA RAO, S/O SATYANARAYANA , AGED 42 YRS OCC,BUSINESS, SRI SATYA SAI VEERABHADRA KIRANA AND GENERAL , D.NO.1, MAIN OPP,BUS STAND , KAMAVARAPUKOTA VILLAGE AND MANDAL , WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (EXCISE) SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI , AMARAVATHI. 2. THE SUPEINTENDANT OF POLICE, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3.THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER TADIKALAPUDI P.S., WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto Issue a Writ or Order more particularly in the nature of a Writ of Certiorari by Call for the Records Pertaining to Confiscation Order Passed in RC.NO.155 / VEHICLE /SEB/C-5 Dt 30- 08-2021 it was dispatched on 11-09-2021 vide Postal Receipt No.RN878386283IN received by the petitoiner dt.13- 09-2021 in connection with the Seizure of AUTO RICKSHAW bearing Reg. No. AP 37 TC 8039 in Cr.No. 82/2021 of S.H.O. Tadikalapudi Police Station in Transportation of Jaggery all areillegal, unlawful , against the G.O. MS.NO. 149 Clause (VIII )(IX) dated 18-04-2017 , Violation of Principles of Ntural Justice , Violation of of Article 14,19,21 of the Constituton of India , Violation of Various High Court Rulings , there by to-Set Aside the Confiscation Order Consequently to direct the Respondents 2 and 3 to Return the Seized Vehicle i.e., Auto bearing Reg.No. AP 37 TC 8039 to the Petitioner in the intrest of the justice. IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order to direct the Respondents 2 and 3 to Return the Seized Vehicle i.e., Auto bearing Reg.No. AP 37 2 TC 8039 in Cr.No. 82/2021 of Tadikalapudi P.S., to the Petitioner/Owner in the intrest of the justice IA NO: 2 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass an Order to Suspend the Operation of the Confiscation Order RC .No.155 /Vehicle /SEB/C5 dated 30-08-2021 served on 13-09-2021 in connection with the Vehicle i.e., Auto bearing Reg. No. AP 37 TC 8039 pending disposal of the main Writ Petition in the interst of the justice Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. R SIVA SAI SWARUP Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PROHIBITION EXCISE 2. GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.21821 of 2021 ORDER:- Despite the writ petition being listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, it indicates that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 18.11.2025 KBN 4 19 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.21821 of 2021 Date: 18.11.2025 KBN