SHANKAR LAL S/O SHRI SURENDRA KUMAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/11121/2025 · 2025-11-03
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40176 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40176 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:43989] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11121/2025 Shankar Lal S/o Shri Surendra Kumar, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Village Sami, Police Station Losal, District Sikar (Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail Sikar) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11501/2025 Rajuram S/o Ramlal, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Gram Sami, P.s. Losal, Tehsil Dataramgarh, Distt. Sikar, Rajasthan, Presently Confined At Central Jail Sikar. ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amit Dadhich Mr. Mahendra Singh Rathore Mr. Girraj Prasad Bairwa For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 03/11/2025
1. The petitioners have preferred these bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS in Pt. No.EPF/SKR/(283)/22/2025-26 registered at Excise Police Station Sikar Rural, District-Sikar for offences under Sections 16/54 and 54(D) of Rajasthan Excise Act,
1950.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
[2025:RJ-JP:43989] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-11121/2025]
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in these cases. He further submitted that the allegation against the present petitioners are that they were involved in the manufacturing of the said article; however, no liquor was recovered from the possession of the present petitioners in relation to the said article. Petitioners are behind the bars since 01.08.2025 without any criminal past. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody, hence, the bail applications of the petitioners may be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications.
5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners.
6. Accordingly, the bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. are allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners-Shankar Lal S/o Shri Surendra Kumar and Rajuram S/o Ramlal shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for their appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/17-18