Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40171 (BOM)

BHASKAR BABURAO KADAM v. BALASO BABURAO KADAM

WP/9586/2025 · 2025-08-01

Gauri Godse

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

9_WP_9586_25.docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 9586 OF 2025 Bhaskar Baburao Kadam … Petitioner Vs. Balaso Baburao Kadam … Respondent Mr. Kuldeep Nikam (through video-conferencing) for petitioner. Dr. Uday Warunjikar a/w. Mr. Mahesh Shinde, Ms. Sakshi Inamdar and Shri Sumit Kate for respondent. CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J. DATE : 01st AUGUST 2025 ORDER : 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this petition with liberty to file appropriate application in the substantive suit filed by him, i.e. Regular Civil Suit No.64 of 2022. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that if such an application is filed, the respondent may be granted liberty to raise objections, including maintainability of the application. 1/2 Priya Kambli PRIYA KAMBLI Digitally signed by PRIYA KAMBLI Date: 2025.08.04 12:30:59 +0530 9_WP_9586_25.docx 3. Leave granted. The petitioner is at liberty to file appropriate application in Regular Civil Suit No.64 of 2022 for seeking appropriate relief of injunction as prayed in the present case. 4. The rival contentions of the parties on merits, including maintainability of the application are kept open. 5. If such an application is filed, the same shall be decided on its own merits in accordance with law, uninfluenced by the orders impugned in this petition. 6. The writ petition is disposed of with liberty as recorded above. 7. It is clarified that ad-interim protection operating in this writ petition stands vacated. [GAURI GODSE, J.] 2/2