APHC010343342025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] THURSDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1684/2025 Between: 1. VUSETLA CHANDRA MOHAN RAO,, S/O. CHANDRAIAH, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, EMPLOYEE, W/AS CLUSTER RESOURCE PERSON, MANDAL RESOURCE CENTRE, O/O. MANDAL EDUCATIONAL OFFICE, DACHEPALLI MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, R/O. H.NO.6-46, RAMAPURAM, DACHEPALLI, PALNADU DISTRICT. 2. GUNDA SRINIVASA RAO,, S/O. VENKATA SUBBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, EMPLOYEE,W/AS S.G.T M.P.P.S, SRINIVASAPURAM, DACHEPALLI MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, R/O. H.NO. 6-1/1, BURUJU CENTER, DACHEPALLI, PALNADU DISTRICT. 3. GANGIKUNTA NAGESWARA RAO,, S/O.SEETA RAMAIAH, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, EMPLOYEE,W/AS S.G.T M.P.P.S, KATRAPADU, DACHEPALLI MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, R/O. H.NO. 1-2 TO 3-135A, WATER TANK AREA, RAMAPURAM, DACHEPALLI, PALNADU DISTRICT. 4. KOTHAPALLI RATHAIAH, , S/O.JAGAJJIVANA RAO, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, EMPLOYEE, W/AS S.G.T Z.P.H. SCHOOL, RUKMINIPURAM (THANDA), PIDUGURALLA (PO AND MD). ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. M/S SHRIRAM CHITS P LTD, REP BY ITS SENIOR MANAGER / G.P.A. HOLDER D.NO.307, GANGAMMA TEMPLE, ABOVE CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA, PIDUGURALLA, A.P. - 522 413. 2. KURUGANTI SAROJINIDEVI, W/O. RUDRAIAH, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS. RETIRED EMPLOYE, W/AS S.G.T L.F.L. H.M. 2 VS,J C.R.P.No.1684 of 2025 DACHEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, R/O. H. NO. 13-2, INDIRA COLONY, DACHEPALLI, PALNADU DISTRICT. (3RD RESPONDENT IS J.DR NO. 4 HENCE NOT NECESSARY IN THIS PETITION, HENCE GIVEN UP). 3. THE MANDAL EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, O/O. MANDAL EDUCATION OFFICE, DACHEPALLIMANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT - 522 414. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to the above named Petitioner begs to present this Memorandum of grounds in Civil Revision Petition against the Order dated 16.12.2024passed in E.P.No. 34 of 2023 in Dispute No. 170 of 2016, on the file of Civil Judge (Junior Division), Piduguralla IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be Pleased to condone delay of 106 days in filing Civil Revision Petition against docket order dt 16.12.2024 in E.P.No. 34 of 2023 in Dispute No. 170 of 2016 in the court of the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Piduguralla and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be Pleased to grant stay of docket order dt 16.12.2024 in E.P.No. 34 of 2023 in Dispute No. 170 of 2016 in the court of the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Piduguralla pending the above Civil Revision Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. KALEPU PRAVEEN KRISHNA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. O UDAYA KUMAR The Court made the following: 3 VS,J C.R.P.No.1684 of 2025 ORDER: The present Civil Revision Petition has been filed by the petitioners/Judgment debtors No.1 to 3 &5 challenging the docket order dated 16.12.2024 passed in E.P.No.34 of 2023 in Dispute No.170 of 2016 on the file of Civil Judge (Junior Division), Piduguralla. 2. On 10.10.2025, this Court passed the following interim order: “…There shall be an interim stay of order dated 16.122024 in E.P.No.34 of 2023 in Dispute No.170 of 2016 on the file of the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Piduguralla on condition of deposit of 50% of the E.P. amount, within a period of two (2) weeks from today before the Execution Court. On such deposit, respondent No.1 is directed to withdraw the same without furnishing any security. It is made clear that within a time stipulated herein above if the said amount is not deposited, the order of stay granted herein shall stand vacated.” 3. Today, when the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners has stated that the interim order dated 10.10.2025 granted by this Court has not been complied with by the petitioners and on the other hand, the salary attachment has also been ordered by the trial Court. 4. In view of the same, no further cause survives in the present Civil Revision Petition. 5. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. 4 VS,J C.R.P.No.1684 of 2025 Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this petition shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date: 06.11.2025 KGR