APHC010042882024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] FRIDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 403/2024 Between: 1. MR.VEGI JAGADISH, S/O.LATE.VEGIJAGANNADHA RAO AGED 45YEARS, OCC EMPLOYEE, PRESENTLY R/O 1294 SAVANNAH DR, LONDON ONTARIO N5X OB7, CANADA, REPRESENTED BY HIS GPA HOLDER SRI BHIMAVARAPUSRINIVASA REDDY S/O.BHADRI REDDY BHIMAVARAPU AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS OCC LEMPLOYEE RESIDENT OF 17-101 ,GANESH NAGAR, SALAGRAMPURAM, VISAKHAPATNAM – 530024 2. SMT. BUDDHA RATNAKUMARI, W/O. B.M. NAIDU AGED 79 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE, PRESENTLY R/O FLAT 201, PRATHIMA PARADISE DOOR NO 15-15-43 VISAKHAPATNAM - 530 002 ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. SRI C M SAIKANTH VARMA, COMMISSIONER THE GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION(GVMC), VISAKHAPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. DR A MALLIKHARJUNA IAS, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, VISAKHAPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to summon the respondents/contemnors for willfully violating order dated. 11.01.2024 in WP No. 1025 of 2024 and punish them as per the law in the interest of Justice. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. K B RAMANNA DORA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. K.MADHAVA REDDY (SC FOR GVMC) 2. P SUBASH The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: The above contempt case has been filed complaining about the non- implementation of the order dated 11.01.2024, passed in W.P.No.1025 of 2024. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing on either side. 3. The petitioners filed W.P.No.1025 of 2024, challenging the action of respondent authorities particularly respondent No.2 in interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the property admeasuring 1397 Square Yards in T.P.No.2/74, patta No.199 in Sy.No.8/1 of Maddilapalem Village, wherein an interim order was granted on 11.01.2024, directing the respondent authorities not to interfere in the aforementioned property. 4. In the affidavit filed in support of the contempt case, it was pleaded that the respondents proceeded with the construction of a compound wall over the property of the petitioner. 5. A counter-affidavit has been filed by respondent No.1. In para No.10, it was pleaded that on receipt of the order copy dated 11.01.2024, the GVMC has stopped the construction of the compound wall. No rejoinder has been filed by learned counsel for the petitioner. Page 3 of 4 6. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, Sri Venkatachallarao learned counsel representing Sri K.Ramanna Dora, learned counsel for the petitioner, would submit that pursuant to the interim order dated 11.01.2024, no further construction has been made. The same is recorded. 7. Given the facts and circumstances of the case, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 31.10.2025 TVN 267 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE No.403 OF 2024 Date: 31.10.2025 TVN