Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40155 (KAR)

SRI PRAVEEN PATIL v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/14819/2025 · 2025-10-17

Ashok S Kinagi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41567 WP No. 14819 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 14819 OF 2025 (S-RES) BETWEEN: SRI PRAVEEN PATIL S/O. A.C PATIL KULKARNI AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS BASAVAPATTNA CHANNAGIRI TALUK DAVANAGERE - 577 551 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHOWRI H R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY IT'S CHIEF SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION (PRIMARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION) M.S BUILDING BENGALURU 560 001. Digitally signed by SUNITHA K S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41567 WP No. 14819 of 2025 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION (PRIMARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION) M.S BUILDING, BENGALURU 560 001 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS DAVAGERE 577 551 4. SRI RAGHAVENDRA GURUKULA VIDYAPEETA (R) CHANNAGIRI TALUK DAVANAGERE 577 551 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B. SUKANYA BALIGA, AGA FOR R1 TO R3 R4 SERVED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-2 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DTD. 14.03.2024 AT ANNX-A AND FURTHER DIRECT THE R-2 TO APPROVE THE APPOINTMENT OF THE PETITIONER AT R-4 SCHOOL AND EXTEND THE BENEFIT OF GRANT IN AID AND OTHER CONSEQUENTIAL BENEFITS TO THE PETITIONER. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41567 WP No. 14819 of 2025 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing the matter for some time, filed a memo seeking for the leave of this Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to make a fresh representation to the respondents and direct the respondents to consider the representation within time bound. 2. The memo is place on record. 3. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. The liberty is reserved to the petitioner to submit a fresh representation to the respondents within three weeks from today. If such a representation is made by the petitioner, respondents No.1 and 2 are directed to - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41567 WP No. 14819 of 2025 consider the same and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, within three weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE PA CT:KHV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 49