Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40155 (JHR)

PRATIMA KUMARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, SCHOOL EDUCATION AND LITERACY DEPARTMENT

C.M.P./902/2025 · 2025-09-26

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:30464 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No. 902 of 2025 1. Pratima Kumari, aged about 43 years, Daughter of Bhuneshwar Pramanik, Resident of Diesel Colony, Railway Station Road, P.O. & P.S. Patratu, District Ramgarh. 2. Reetika Rani, aged about 44 years, Wife of Madan Sharma, Resident of House No. A/31, Loco Colony. Pochra, P.0.- Barkakana, P.S. Patratu, District- Ramgarh. … … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through its Secretary, School Education and Literacy Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, Project Building, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District-Ranchi. 2. The Director, Secondary Education, Govt. of Jharkhand, Office at Project Building, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District-Ranchi. 3. Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, through its Chairman, Office at Kali Nagar, Chai Bagan, Namkum, P.O. & P.S.-Namkum, District- Ranchi. 4. The Secretary, Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, Office at Kali Nagar, Chai Bagan, Namkum, P.O. & P.S. Namkum, District- Ranchi. 5. The Controller of Examination, Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, Office at Kali Nagar, Chai Bagan, Namkum, P.O. & P.S. Namkum, District- Ranchi. 6. The Secretary, Department of Personnel, Administrative Reforms and Rajbhasa, Govt. of Jharkhand, Office at Project Building, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi … … Opp. Parties --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner(s) : Md. Imtiaz Khan, Advocate For the JSSC : Mr. Tejo Mistri, Advocate For the State : Mr. Apoorva Singh, Advocate --- 03/26th September 2025 1. Learned counsel for the parties are present. 2. This petition has been filed for restoration of W.P. (S) No. 4439 of 2023, which stood dismissed on account of non-removal of defects in terms of order dated 28.02.2024. 2025:JHHC:30464 2 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that on account of personal reasons, the defects could not be removed. He has further submitted if some time is granted and the writ petition is restored, he shall do the needful to remove the defects. 4. Learned counsel for the opposite parties have no serious objection to the prayer for restoration. 5. Considering the submissions, time for removal of defects in W.P. (S) No. 4439 of 2023 is extended till 31.10.2025. 6. If the defects in the writ petition are removed within extended period, office is directed to place the writ petition before appropriate Bench as per roster. 7. This C.M.P. is hereby disposed of. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 26.09.2025 Mukul/-