2025:JHHC:33953 --1-- A.B.A. No. 5359 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 5359 of 2025 ---- Vinay Vishwakarma @ Vinay Viswakarma, aged about 34 years, son of Khogen Viswakarma, resident of village – Deoli, PO – Jangalpur, PS – Govindpur, District – Dhanbad .... Petitioner -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioner :- Mr. Dilip Kr. Chakraverty, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Praful Jojo, Advocate ---- 03/13.11.2025 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Sector 12 P.S. Case No.83 of 2025, for the alleged offences registered under Sections 126(2), 127(2), 115(2), 117(2), 118(1), 118(2), 109, 303(2), 140(2), 318(4), 316(2) and 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Bokaro. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner happened to be the employee of RHI Nature Wellness Pvt. Ltd. where the informant was also working. He further submits that the informant has also withdrawn a sum of Rs.2,04,600/- from the said company pursuant to the work discharged by the informant as an employee. He next submits that the allegations are made of 2025:JHHC:33953 --2-- A.B.A. No. 5359 of 2025 paying Rs.40,000/- for providing job by the petitioner. He further submits that no amount has been received by the petitioner and the false allegations are made against him. He then submits that by last order case diary was called for and in the case diary it has come that injury is simple in nature. He also submits that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph No.13 of the petition. He submits that the petitioner is friend of Sanjeev Kumar @ Sanjeev Kumar Yadav and there is no allegation of taking money against the petitioner and the allegations are there against Sanjeev Kumar @ Sanjeev Kumar Yadav who has been granted anticipatory bail in ABA No.5278 of 2025 and other accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail in ABA No.5291 of 2025. 5. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer and submits that the allegations are there against the petitioner of taking money for providing job. 6. Considering that the petitioner and the informant are said to be worker in RHI Nature Wellness Pvt. Ltd. and the informant has withdrawn a sum of Rs.2,04,600/- on account of wages and in the case diary it has come that the injury is said to be simple in nature and the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph No.13 of the petition, I am inclined to provide anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 7. Accordingly, the petitioner, above named, is hereby directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from 2025:JHHC:33953 --3-- A.B.A. No. 5359 of 2025 today, and in the event of his surrender/arrest, the petitioner, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Bokaro in connection with Sector 12 P.S. Case No.83 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 13.11.2025 Sangam/