Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40152 (JHR)

DWARIKA NATH MANDAL v. CHEPI MNDALIN ALIAS CHAPLI MANDALAIN

C.M.P./107/2019 · 2025-11-07

Rajesh Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:33266 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No. 107 of 2019 1. Dwarika Nath Mandal, aged about 76 years, son of Shri Hari Mandal, resident of village Asanbani, P.S. Barwadda, P.O. Yadavpur, District:- Dhanbad. 2. Bhabi Mandalain, aged about 80 years, wife of Sadhu Mandal and daughter of Late Jayram Mandal, resident of village Koiyritand, P.O. & P.S. Barwadda, District Dhanbad. 3. Pagal Mandal, aged about 65 years 4. Vijay Mandal, aged akurt-60 years 5. Padda Mandal aged about 47 years All the Appellant Nos. 3 to 5 sons of Late Chandra Mandal, resident of village Moranga, Bheltand, P.O. & P.S. Govindpur, District:-Dhanbad. ….........Appellants/ Petitioner(s) Vrs. 1. Chepi Mandalain @ Chapli Mandalain w/o Guhiram Manda, daughter of Jitu Mandal, resident of Goludih, P.O. Palani, P.S. Baliapur, District: - Dhanbad ...... Respondent/ Opposite Party(s) 2.Khuni Mandalain, w/o Late Prahalad Mandal, resident of village Saraidhela, P.O. & P.S. Saraidhela, District Dhanbad. 3. Potali Mandalain w/o Rasu Mandal, daughter of Late Jayarm Mandal, resident of Saraidhela, P.O & P.S. Saraidhela, District:- Dhanbad. 4.Nimai Mandal son of Late Satish Chandra Mandal, resident of village Moranga, Belatand, P.O. and P.S. Govindpur, District: - Dhanbad. 5. Shanti Devi wife of Nepal Orra mother of Praveen Orra, resident of village Shanti Bhawan, Bank More, P.O. & P.S. Bank More, District: Dhanbad ...... Proforma Respondents/Opposite Party(s) ….... CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR For the Petitioner(s) : None For the O.P.(s) : 11/07.11.2025 The last order dated 01.08.2025 reads as under: “1. As per the office note, it appears that the present civil miscellaneous petition has been filed against the dead persons. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks an adjournment for verifying the same. 3. As prayed for, list this case after four weeks.” 2. Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner to prosecute the 2025:JHHC:33266 2 case. 3. Accordingly, the instant C.M.P. is dismissed for want of prosecution. 4. Consequently, I.A. No. 3928 of 2019 also stands disposed of. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) 07.11.2025 A.Mohanty