Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40152 (ALL)

KRISHNASHRAY SRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

WRIB/1361/2025 · 2025-05-25

Chandra Kumar Rai

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:91544 Court No. - 50 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 1361 of 2025 Petitioner :- Krishnashray Srivastava Respondent :- State Of Up And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Arun Kumar Srivastava,Priyanka Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rameshwar Prasad Shukla Hon'ble Chandra Kumar Rai,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner, Sri Tarun Gaur, learned Standing Counsel for the State and Sri Rameshwar Prasad Shukla, learned Counsel for the Gaon Sabha. 2. The instant petition has been filed for the following reliefs:- "(a) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus the Consolidation Officer, Sagri, District Azamgarh to decide the application filed by petitioner under Rule 109 of U.P.C.H. Act being Case No. 10 of 2018 (Krishnashray Srivastava Vs. State) pending in the Court of Consolidation Officer, Sagri, District Azamgarh within some stipulated period as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court. (b) issue any other writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the circumstances of the present case. (c) award the cost of the petition in favour of petitioner." 3. This Court vide order dated 11.04.2025 directed the learned Standing Counsel to obtain instructions in the matter. In compliance of the order of this Court instruction dated 28.04.2025 sent by Consolidation Officer is taken on record. 4. Sri Tarun Gaur, learned Standing Counsel on the basis of instruction submitted that certain objection at the instance of Gulab Chand and Gauri Shankar have been filed on 16.08.2024 in the pending proceeding, as such after disposal of the objection filed by Gulab Chand and Gauri Shandkar, the pending proceeding shall be decided in accordance with law. 5. Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, the instant petition is finally disposed of directing the respondent no. 3/Consolidation Officer, Sagri, District Azamgarh to decide the aforementioned pending proceeding under Rule 109 of the U.P.C.H. Rules bearing Case No. 210 of 2018, after affording proper opportunity of hearing to the parties expeditiously preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order. Order Date :- 26.5.2025 Neetu Digitally signed by :- NEETU SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad