[2025:RJ-JP:40675] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9147/2023 Rajeev Kumar Gurjar S/o Rajesh Kumar Kohli, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Kan Ka Dhani, Near Railway Station, Sanganer, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Education Secretary, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. State Of Rajasthan, Through Joint Secretary To The Government, Department Of Personnel, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary-Cum- Commissioner, Panchayati Raj, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 4. The Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9152/2023 Kiran Patel D/o Moolchand Gurjar, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Village Kalyanpura, Post Dudhi Amloda, Tehsil Virat Nagar, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Education Secretary, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. State Of Rajasthan, Through Joint Secretary To The Government, Department Of Personnel, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary-Cum- Commissioner, Panchayati Raj, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 4. The Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13307/2023 1. Naveen Kumar S/o Shanker Lal, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Vpo Jakhora, Tehsil Chirawa, District Jhunjhunu, [2025:RJ-JP:40675] (2 of 4) [CW-9147/2023] Rajasthan. 2. Pankaj Kumar Saini S/o Ghanshyam Saini, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Ward No. 13, Bagar Ki Dhani, Diggi, Tehsil Malpura, District Tonk, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Education Secretary, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. State Of Rajasthan, Through Joint Secretary To The Government, Department Of Personnel, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary-Cum- Commissioner, Panchayati Raj, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 4. The Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. 5. The District Education Officer (Headquarter), Secondary Education, Tonk. ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15297/2023 1. Raju Lal Naruka S/o Prabhu Lal, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Devli Road, Adarsh Nagar, Tonk, Rajasthan. 2. Tulsi Ram Gwala S/o Mohan Lal Gwala, Aged About 46 Years, R/o Near Masjid Muneer Khan, Rajban, Tonk, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Education Secretary, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. State Of Rajasthan, Through Joint Secretary To The Government, Department Of Personnel, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary-Cum- Commissioner, Panchayati Raj, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 4. The Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. 5. The District Education Officer (Headquarter), Secondary Education, Tonk. [2025:RJ-JP:40675] (3 of 4) [CW-9147/2023] ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini Mr. Aamir Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.M. Sharma for Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG Mr. Devansh Sharma, DY. GC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 07/10/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners while referring order dated 08.09.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8348/2023 submits that the controversy in these cases is no more res integra and the matters be disposed of in accordance with order dated 28.05.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10548/2023 (Sudarshana Jangid Vs. State of Rajasthan and Anr.) and order dated 03.02.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12131/2023 (Pratap Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan and Anr. & other connected petitions) passed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent submits that these writ petitions be disposed of on basis of principle of law as already settled by this Hon’ble Court in referred judgment, if these petitioners are squarely covered from the issue raised herein. 3. Having regard to the submissions of learned counsels that these writ petitions falls within the ambit of principle laid down in the aforesaid judgments, therefore, it is hereby directed that the [2025:RJ-JP:40675] (4 of 4) [CW-9147/2023] principle of law as extended in aforementioned writ petition shall be equally applicable in these writ petitions and these writ petitions are disposed of in same terms as expressed in Sudarshana Jangid Vs. State (supra) and Pratap Ram Vs. State (supra). 4. Accordingly, these writ petitions and misc. application(s), if any stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MONU/168-169, 171 and 172