APHC010578222025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] THURSDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 30784/2025 Between: 1. ALLA VENKATA RAO, S/O HANUMANTHA RAO, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS R/O BADEPURAM VILLAGE, TADIKONDA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. TAI @ KOTI KALPANA, W/O PEDDA HANUMANTHARAO AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS , R/O BADEPURAM VILLAGE, TADIKONDA MANDAL GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COLLECTOR AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, GUNTUR. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, GUNTUR DISTRICT, GUNTUR. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, TADIKONDA MANDAL, TADIKONDA, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the inaction the respondents in particularly Respondent in considering the applications dated 24- 05-2022, 19-04-2022 2 made by the petitioners 1 and 2 respectively, despite the specific directions in the order passed by this Hon’ble Court in W.P. No. 18095/2022 dated 29- 06-2022 and receipt of subsequent counsel notice dated 07-08-2025, seeking for the mutation of their names in online revenue records i.e., IB, Adangal and pattadar passbook as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violation of principles of natural justice, article 300-A of constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent No.2 to mutate the names of the petitioners in online revenue records i.e., IB, Adangal and pattadar passbook for the property at total extent of Ac.4.18 cents in Sy.No.1467/B of Tadikonda Village and Mandal, Guntur District, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent to consider and dispose of the applications dated 24-05-2022, 19-04-2022 made by the petitioners 1 and 2 respectively, seeking for the mutation of their names in online revenue records i.e., 1B, Adangal and pattadar passbook in strict compliance with the order earlier passed by this Hon’ble Court as well as after receipt of the subsequent notice dated 07-08-2025, and communicate the same to the petitioners, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. MALLIKARJUNA RAO CH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: The present Writ Petition is filed, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief: “to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or an appropriate writ or order declaring the inaction the respondents in particularly Respondent in considering the applications dated 24-05-2022, 19-04-2022 made by the petitioners 1 and 2 respectively, despite the specific directions in the order passed by this Hon’ble Court in W.P. No. 18095/2022 dated 29- 06-2022 and receipt of subsequent counsel notice dated 07-08-2025, seeking for the mutation of their names in online revenue records i.e., IB, Adangal and pattadar passbook as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violation of principles of natural justice, article 300-A of constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent No.2 to mutate the names of the petitioners in online revenue records i.e., IB, Adangal and pattadar passbook for the property at total extent of Ac.4.18 cents in Sy.No.1467/B of Tadikonda Village and Mandal, Guntur District, and pass...” 2. Heard Mr. Ch.Mallikarjuna Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for respondents. 3. Pending Writ Petition, learned Assistant Government Pleader has placed the endorsement passed by the authorities on 15.9.2025 and the said endorsement was also handed over to the learned counsel for the petitioners. 4. In view of the same, nothing survives in the Writ Petition. But liberty is given to the petitioners to challenge the said endorsement in proper forum. 4 5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed. No costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications pending, if any, in the writ petition, shall also stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH 20.11.2025 RD 5 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH WRIT PETITION No.30784 of 2025 20.11.2025 RD