Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40143 (RAJ)

SANDEEP KHANDELWAL S/O SHRI M.C. KHANDELWAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/17786/2025 · 2025-12-10

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:50305] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17786/2025 Sandeep Khandelwal S/o Shri M.C. Khandelwal, Aged About 54 Years, R/o Flat No. B-304, Felicity Enclave, Swaj Farm, Jaipur (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Personnel, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. The Principal Secretary, Cooperative Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. The Joint Secretary, Cooperative Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 4. The Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 5. Rajasthan State Cooperative Land Development Bank Limited, Through Managing Director, Nehru Sahkar Bhawan, 22 Godam Circle, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sandeep Pathak For Respondent(s) : Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC Mr. Hansraj Kuldeep, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 10/12/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “(a) Quash and set aside the impugned order dated 31.10.2025, Memorandum of Charges dated 16.06.2025 and all consequential proceedings initiated against the Petitioner; (b) Declare the action of the Respondents for initiating disciplinary proceedings against the [2025:RJ-JP:50305] (2 of 2) [CW-17786/2025] Petitioner as illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction; (c) Pass any other order, which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in favour of the Petitioners and in the interest of justice. (d) Cost of the writ petition may also be awarded in favour of the Petitioners.” 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve his grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/188