IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 154 CWP-8819-2025 Date of decision: 27.03.2025 MAHIMA SAINI AND ANOTHER ….PETITIONERS Vs. DIRECTOR SCHOOL EDUCATION, CHANDIGARH ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: Mr. L.K. Gollen, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ashish Rawal, Addl. Standing Counsel and Mr. Rohit Kaushik, Panel Counsel for the respondent-U.T., Chandigarh. **** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the respondent, at the outset, submits that the petitioner has alternative remedy to approach Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) which is located at Chandigarh. Thus, petitioners may be relegated to CAT at Chandigarh. 2. Faced with this, Mr. L.K. Gollen, Advocate expressed his inability to controvert the fact that petitioners have alternative remedy to approach CAT, Chandigarh. 3 In the wake of statement of both sides, instant petition stands dismissed with liberty to approach CAT, Chandigarh. 27.03.2025 [JAGMOHAN BANSAL] manoj JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No MANOJ KUMAR 2025.03.28 10:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document